AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of montelukast, a medication, versus a placebo in helping outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19 recover from their symptoms more quickly.
  • - Conducted as part of the ACTIV-6 trial, 1250 participants aged 30 and older were enrolled from across 104 U.S. sites, receiving either montelukast or a placebo for 14 days.
  • - Results showed no significant difference in recovery times between those taking montelukast and those taking the placebo, with both groups having a median recovery time of 10 days and minimal hospitalizations or adverse events reported.

Article Abstract

Importance: The effect of montelukast in reducing symptom duration among outpatients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is uncertain.

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of montelukast compared with placebo in treating outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19.

Design Setting And Participants: The ACTIV-6 platform randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of repurposed medications in treating mild to moderate COVID-19. Between January 27, 2023, and June 23, 2023, 1250 participants ≥30 years of age with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and ≥2 acute COVID-19 symptoms for ≤7 days, were included across 104 US sites to evaluate the use of montelukast.

Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive montelukast 10 mg once daily or matched placebo for 14 days.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary outcome was time to sustained recovery (defined as at least 3 consecutive days without symptoms). Secondary outcomes included time to death; time to hospitalization or death; a composite of hospitalization, urgent care visit, emergency department visit, or death; COVID clinical progression scale; and difference in mean time unwell.

Results: Among participants who were randomized and received study drug, the median age was 53 years (IQR 42-62), 60.2% were female, 64.6% identified as Hispanic/Latino, and 56.3% reported ≥2 doses of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Among 628 participants who received montelukast and 622 who received placebo, differences in time to sustained recovery were not observed (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.02; 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.92-1.12; P(efficacy) = 0.63]). Unadjusted median time to sustained recovery was 10 days (95% confidence interval 10-11) in both groups. No deaths were reported and 2 hospitalizations were reported in each group; 36 participants reported healthcare utilization events (a priori defined as death, hospitalization, emergency department/urgent care visit); 18 in the montelukast group compared with 18 in the placebo group (HR 1.01; 95% CrI 0.45-1.84; P(efficacy)=0.48). Five participants experienced serious adverse events (3 with montelukast and 2 with placebo).

Conclusions And Relevance: Among outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19, treatment with montelukast does not reduce duration of COVID-19 symptoms.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04885530 ).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11118662PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.16.24307115DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

time sustained
16
sustained recovery
16
mild moderate
16
outpatients mild
12
montelukast
8
randomized clinical
8
clinical trial
8
compared placebo
8
moderate covid-19
8
participants randomized
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!