The impact of X-ray scatter correction software on abdomen radiography in terms of image quality and radiation dose.

Introduction: The conventional anti-scatter grid is widely used in X-ray radiography to reduce scattered X-rays, but it increases patient dose. Scatter-correction software offers a dose-reducing alternative by correcting for scattered X-rays without a physical grid. Grids and software correction are necessary to reduce scatter radiation and improve image quality especially for the large body parts. The scatter correction can be beneficial in situations where the use of grid is challenging. The implementation of grids and advanced software correction techniques is imperative to ensure that radiographic images maintain high levels of clarity, contrast, and resolution, and ultimately facilitating more accurate diagnoses. This study compares image quality and radiation dose for abdomen exams using scatter correction software and physical grids.

Methods: An anthropomorphic phantom (abdomen) underwent imaging with varying fat and lean tissue layers and body mass index (BMI) configurations. Imaging parameters included 70 kVp tube voltage, 110 cm SID, and Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) both lateral and central chambers. AP abdomen X-ray projections were acquired with and without an anti-scatter grid, and scatter correction software was applied. Image quality was assessed using contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and signal to noise ratio (SNR) metrics. The tube current mAs was considered an exposure factor that affected radiation dose and was used to compare the VG software and physical grid. Radiation dose was measured using Dose Area Products (DAP). The effective dose was estimated using Monte Carlo simulation-PCXMC software. Paired t-tests were used to investigate the image quality difference between the Gridless and VG software, Gridless and PG, and VG software and PG approaches. For the DAP and effective dose, paired t-test was used to investigate the difference between VG software and PG.

Results: Images acquired with a grid had the highest mean CNR (71.3 ± 32) compared to Gridless (50 ± 33.8) and scatter correction software (59.3 ± 37.9). The mean SNR of the grid images was (82.7.3 ± 38.9), which is 18% higher than the scatter correction software images (70.4 ± 36.7) and 29% higher than in the Gridless images (62.9.3 ± 34). The mean DAP value was reduced by 81% when the scatter correction software was used compared to the grid (mean: 65.4 μGy.m and 338.2 μGy.m, respectively) with a significant difference (p = 0.001). Scatter correction software resulted in a lower effective dose compared to physical grid use, (mean difference± SD = -0.3 ± 0.18 mSv) with a significant difference (P = 0.02).

Conclusion: Scatter correction software reduced the radiation dose required but images employing a grid yielded higher CNR and SNR. However, the radiation dose reduction might affect the image quality to a level that impacts the diagnostic information available. Thus, further research needs to be conducted to optimise the use of the scatter correction software.

Implication For Practice: Objectively, X-ray scatter correction software might be promising in conditions where a grid cannot be applied.