Reliability and Validity of the Strain Gauge "GSTRENGTH" for Measuring Peak Force in the Isometric Belt Squat at Different Joint Angles.

Sensors (Basel)

Sport Sciences Research Centre, Faculty of Education & Sport Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Fuenlabrada, 28943 Madrid, Spain.

Published: May 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of a new device called "GSTRENGTH" for measuring peak force (PF) during isometric belt squat exercises, providing a cost-effective alternative to traditional force plates.
  • - Five subjects were tested at three different knee angles, performing a total of 24 contractions on two occasions, with peak force data collected using both force plates and a strain gauge.
  • - Results indicated a strong correlation and high agreement between the measurements from "GSTRENGTH" and force plates, suggesting it is a valid alternative for assessing peak force in isometric strength exercises.

Article Abstract

Since isometric training is gaining popularity, some devices are being developed to test isometric force as an alternative to the more expensive force plates (FPs); thus, the aim of this study was to test the reliability and validity of "GSTRENGTH" for measuring PF in the isometric belt squat exercise. Five subjects performed 24 contractions at three different knee angles (90°, 105° and 120°) on two occasions (120 total cases). Peak force data were measured using FPs and a strain gauge (SG) and analyzed by Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient, ICCs, Cronbach's alpha, a paired sample -test and Bland-Altman plots. Perfect or almost perfect relationships (r: 0.999-1) were found with an almost perfect or perfect level of agreement (ICCs: 0.992-1; α: 0.998-1). The -test showed significant differences for the raw data but not for the predictions by the equations obtained with the SG values. The Bland-Altman plots, when significant, showed trivial to moderate values for systematic bias in general. In conclusion, "GSTRENGTH" was shown to be a valid alternative to FPs for measuring PF.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11125260PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s24103256DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reliability validity
8
strain gauge
8
"gstrength" measuring
8
peak force
8
isometric belt
8
belt squat
8
bland-altman plots
8
perfect perfect
8
validity strain
4
gauge "gstrength"
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!