A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Accelerated Ballast Tank Corrosion Simulation Protocols: A Critical Assessment. | LitMetric

Accelerated Ballast Tank Corrosion Simulation Protocols: A Critical Assessment.

Materials (Basel)

Department Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium.

Published: May 2024

In the realm of accelerated testing within controlled laboratory settings, the fidelity of the service environment assumes paramount importance. It is imperative to replicate real-world conditions while compressing the testing duration to facilitate early evaluations, thereby optimizing time and cost efficiencies. Traditional immersion protocols, reflective solely of full ballast tank conditions, inadequately expedite the corrosion process representative of an average ballast tank environment. Through the integration of immersion with fog/dry conditions, aligning the test protocol more closely with the internal conditions of an average ballast tank, heightened rates of general corrosion are achieved. This augmentation yields an acceleration factor of 7.82 times the standard test duration, under the assumption of a general corrosion rate of 0.4 mm/year for uncoated ballast tank steel, with both sides exposed. Subsequently, the fog/dry test protocol, albeit only resembling the environment of an empty ballast tank, closely trails in terms of acceleration efficacy. The fog/dry test protocol offers cost-effectiveness and replicability compared to the AMACORT CIFD-01 protocol, making it a strong competitor despite the relatively close acceleration factor.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11122988PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma17102304DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ballast tank
24
test protocol
12
average ballast
8
general corrosion
8
acceleration factor
8
fog/dry test
8
tank
6
ballast
5
accelerated ballast
4
corrosion
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!