AI Article Synopsis

  • - Minimally invasive surgery is the preferred treatment for high-risk endometrial cancer, with complete lymphadenectomy being crucial in these cases
  • - A study involving 25 patients analyzed the effectiveness of single vs. dual docking during robotic surgery for lymphadenectomy, noting the patients' average age and BMI
  • - Results showed no significant differences in surgery quality or duration between docking types, but highlighted a correlation between surgery duration and previous operations, and found BMI influenced the number of lymph nodes removed.

Article Abstract

(1) The surgical method of choice for the treatment of endometrial cancer is minimally invasive surgery. In cases of high-risk endometrial cancer, completed paraaortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy are indicated. The aim of this study was to analyze the types of docking during robotic surgery assisted with the da Vinci X system while performing paraaortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. (2) Methods: A total of 25 patients with high-risk endometrial cancer, with a mean age of 60.07 ± 10.67 (range 34.69-83.23) years, and with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 28.4 ± 5.62 (range 18-41.5) kg/m, were included in this study. The analyzed population was divided into groups that underwent single or dual docking during surgery. (3) Results: No statistical significance was observed between single and dual docking during paraaortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy and between the type of docking and the duration of the operation. However, there was a statistically significant correlation between the duration of the operation and previous surgery ( < 0.005). The number of removed lymph nodes was statistically associated with BMI ( < 0.005): 15.87 ± 6.83 and 24.5 ± 8.7 for paraaortic and pelvic lymph nodes, respectively, in cases of single docking, and 18.05 ± 7.92 and 24.88 ± 11.75 for paraaortic and pelvic lymph nodes, respectively, in cases of dual docking. (4) Conclusions: The robot-assisted approach is a good surgical method for lymphadenectomy for obese patients, and, despite the type of docking, there are no differences in the quality of surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11122409PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm14050441DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

paraaortic pelvic
24
pelvic lymphadenectomy
16
endometrial cancer
16
high-risk endometrial
12
dual docking
12
lymph nodes
12
robotic surgery
8
surgical method
8
single dual
8
type docking
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!