AI Article Synopsis

  • Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the best method for analyzing right ventricular (RV) volume and function, but it often requires tedious manual adjustments after automatic measurements.
  • This study aimed to test a simplified formula based on echocardiography (truncated cone-rhomboid pyramid formula or CPF) to quantify RV using CMR with fewer measurements.
  • Results showed that while RV volumes calculated with CPF were slightly higher and ejection fraction (EF) lower than those obtained through standard CMR, the two methods had a strong correlation, indicating CPF's feasibility for RV analysis.

Article Abstract

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the reference method for right ventricular (RV) volume and function analysis, but time-consuming manual segmentation and corrections of imperfect automatic segmentations are needed. This study sought to evaluate the applicability of an echocardiographically established truncated cone-rhomboid pyramid formula (CPF) for simplified RV quantification using CMR. : A total of 70 consecutive patients assigned to RV analysis using CMR were included. As standard method, the manual contouring of RV-short axis planes was performed for the measurement of end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV). Additionally, two linear measurements in four-chamber views were obtained in systole and diastole: basal diameters at the level of tricuspid valve (Dd and Ds) and baso-apical lengths from the center of tricuspid valve to the RV apex (Ld and Ls) were measured for the calculation of RV-EDV = 1.21 × Dd × Ld and RV-ESV = 1.21 × Ds × Ls using CPF. RV volumes using CPF were slightly higher than those using standard CMR analysis (RV-EDV index: 86.2 ± 29.4 mL/m and RV-ESV index: 51.5 ± 22.5 mL/m vs. RV-EDV index: 81.7 ± 24.1 mL/m and RV-ESV index: 44.5 ± 23.2 mL/m) and RV-EF was lower (RV-EF: 41.1 ± 13.5% vs. 48.4 ± 13.7%). Both methods had a strong correlation of RV volumes (ΔRV-EDV index = -4.5 ± 19.0 mL/m; r = 0.765, < 0.0001; ΔRV-ESV index = -7.0 ± 14.4 mL/m; r = 0.801, < 0.0001). Calculations of RV volumes and function using CPF assuming the geometrical model of a truncated cone-rhomboid pyramid anatomy of RV is feasible, with a strong correlation to measurements using standard CMR analysis, and only two systolic and diastolic linear measurements in four-chamber views are needed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11121834PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm13102850DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

truncated cone-rhomboid
12
cone-rhomboid pyramid
12
pyramid formula
8
cardiac magnetic
8
magnetic resonance
8
linear measurements
8
measurements four-chamber
8
four-chamber views
8
tricuspid valve
8
standard cmr
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the best method for analyzing right ventricular (RV) volume and function, but it often requires tedious manual adjustments after automatic measurements.
  • This study aimed to test a simplified formula based on echocardiography (truncated cone-rhomboid pyramid formula or CPF) to quantify RV using CMR with fewer measurements.
  • Results showed that while RV volumes calculated with CPF were slightly higher and ejection fraction (EF) lower than those obtained through standard CMR, the two methods had a strong correlation, indicating CPF's feasibility for RV analysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!