A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Can Microfluidics Improve Sperm Quality? A Prospective Functional Study. | LitMetric

Can Microfluidics Improve Sperm Quality? A Prospective Functional Study.

Biomedicines

IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVIRMA Valencia, Plaza de la Policía Local 3, 46015 Valencia, Spain.

Published: May 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Some sperm selection methods in clinics haven't changed much over time, even though they have some problems.
  • New technology called microfluidic devices is helping to improve how sperm is selected in tests.
  • In studies, the microfluidic method showed better results for some sperm qualities compared to older methods, but it didn’t improve everything.

Article Abstract

The same sperm selection techniques in assisted reproduction clinics have remained largely unchanged despite their weaknesses. Recently, microfluidic devices have emerged as a novel methodology that facilitates the sperm selection process with promising results. A prospective case-control study was conducted in two phases: 100 samples were used to compare the microfluidic device with Density Gradient, and another 100 samples were used to compare the device with the Swim-up. In the initial phase, a significant enhancement in progressive motility, total progressive motile sperm count, vitality, morphology, and sperm DNA fragmentation were obtained for the microfluidic group compared to Density Gradient. Nevertheless, no statistically significant differences were observed in sperm concentration and chromatin structure stability. In the subsequent phase, the microfluidic group exhibited significant increases in sperm concentration, total progressive motile sperm count, and vitality compared to Swim-up. However, non-significant differences were seen for progressive motility, morphology, DNA structure stability, and DNA fragmentation. Similar trends were observed when results were stratified into quartiles. In conclusion, in a comparison of microfluidics with standard techniques, an improvement in sperm quality parameters was observed for the microfluidic group. However, this improvement was not significant for all parameters.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11118748PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12051131DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

microfluidic group
12
sperm
9
sperm selection
8
100 samples
8
samples compare
8
density gradient
8
progressive motility
8
total progressive
8
progressive motile
8
motile sperm
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!