A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Deep Learning Method for Precise Landmark Identification and Structural Assessment of Whole-Spine Radiographs. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • A study evaluated an automatic landmark detection model using 1017 lateral whole-spine radiographs collected between January 2020 and December 2021, splitting the data into training (819 images) and testing (198 images) sets, with additional external validation using 690 images from other institutions.
  • The model showed the best accuracy in detecting cervical landmarks (error of 1.5-2.4 mm), followed by lumbosacral landmarks (error of 2.1-3.0 mm), while thoracic landmarks had larger errors (2.4-4.3 mm).
  • The model's performance was highly reliable, with excellent agreement between the AI and expert measurements, evidenced by an intraclass correlation coefficient above

Article Abstract

This study measured parameters automatically by marking the point for measuring each parameter on whole-spine radiographs. Between January 2020 and December 2021, 1017 sequential lateral whole-spine radiographs were retrospectively obtained. Of these, 819 and 198 were used for training and testing the performance of the landmark detection model, respectively. To objectively evaluate the program's performance, 690 whole-spine radiographs from four other institutions were used for external validation. The combined dataset comprised radiographs from 857 female and 850 male patients (average age 42.2 ± 27.3 years; range 20-85 years). The landmark localizer showed the highest accuracy in identifying cervical landmarks (median error 1.5-2.4 mm), followed by lumbosacral landmarks (median error 2.1-3.0 mm). However, thoracic landmarks displayed larger localization errors (median 2.4-4.3 mm), indicating slightly reduced precision compared with the cervical and lumbosacral regions. The agreement between the deep learning model and two experts was good to excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficient values >0.88. The deep learning model also performed well on the external validation set. There were no statistical differences between datasets in all parameters, suggesting that the performance of the artificial intelligence model created was excellent. The proposed automatic alignment analysis system identified anatomical landmarks and positions of the spine with high precision and generated various radiograph imaging parameters that had a good correlation with manual measurements.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11117576PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11050481DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

whole-spine radiographs
16
deep learning
12
external validation
8
landmarks median
8
median error
8
learning model
8
radiographs
5
learning method
4
method precise
4
precise landmark
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!