To explore the impact of social distance and information presentation types on self-other risk preferences in monetary tasks. Risk preferences were examined in decision-making tasks and experiential information tasks within different frameworks when participants made decisions for themselves and others. Experiment 1 employed experiential decision tasks and revealed individual differences in decision-making for oneself and others. In gain situations, participants exhibited more risk aversion when deciding for others compared to themselves. Experiment 2 presented both types of information simultaneously to investigate whether risk decisions for oneself and others are influenced by information types. Results indicated that experiential information led participants to make more conservative choices for others, while descriptive information eliminated this effect. This study discovered the influence of social distance on self-other risk decisions and the role of information presentation types in self and other risk decision-making. Future research could further explore self-other decision-making from the perspectives of decision-makers' traits and culture.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11112061PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1357644DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

self-other risk
12
risk decision-making
8
social distance
8
presentation types
8
risk preferences
8
risk decisions
8
risk
7
decision-making
5
impact presentation
4
self-other
4

Similar Publications

Background: Patients with Complex Trauma (CT) may have an impaired ability to trust others and build intimate relationships due to non-integrated representations of self and others. This sometimes leads to an oscillation between needing and fearing intimacy in their adult relationships. This dynamic can occur in the therapeutic relationship, undermining the effectiveness of therapy and affecting the mental health of both the patient and the therapist.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Self vs. Other in Affective Forecasting: The Role of Psychological Distance and Decision from Experience.

Behav Sci (Basel)

November 2024

Guilford Glazer Faculty of Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel.

Article Synopsis
  • - The research explores how people differ in predicting emotional impacts when making decisions for themselves versus others, by examining psychological distance and types of decision-making (description vs. experience).
  • - Two studies involved a gambling task where participants predicted outcomes and revised their decisions based on actual gains or losses, revealing an impact bias where they often overestimated the effects of outcomes on their risk-taking behavior.
  • - Results showed that while people typically became more risk-averse after gains and risk-seeking after losses for themselves, their tendencies shifted differently when considering close friends, with more courageous decisions following gains and more cautious decisions after losses.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Altered representation of peripersonal and interpersonal space in psychopathology.

Clin Psychol Rev

December 2024

Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA. Electronic address:

The space surrounding the body, and the regulation of this buffer zone play a central role in adaptive behavior, with direct implications for psychopathology. The physical distance that we choose to maintain between ourselves and others for social comfort is known as Interpersonal Distance (IPD), whereas the action space that marks the perceptual border between the self and the external world is known as Peripersonal Space (PPS ). While both IPD and PPS represent personal space, they are distinct constructs, each associated with different methodologies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Many children who experience childhood adversity, whether in the form of threat or deprivation, develop adaptive competencies that lead to resilient functioning. Still, research has not succeeded in accurately predicting the level of resilient functioning by any kind of biomarkers, likely because it has sidelined the flexibility inherent in a construct that is situationally and developmentally variable. Whilst recent research acknowledges the importance of redefining resilience in order to reflect its dynamic nature after adversity, evidence for specific behaviors that are developmentally adaptive and dynamic throughout the lifespan is limited.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Artificial intelligence (AI) can enhance human communication, for example, by improving the quality of our writing, voice or appearance. However, AI mediated communication also has risks-it may increase deception, compromise authenticity or yield widespread mistrust. As a result, both policymakers and technology firms are developing approaches to prevent and reduce potentially unacceptable uses of AI communication technologies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!