A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The effect of excessive gas to blood ratios in an ECMO oxygenator. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • ECMO oxygenators for children need to handle varying flow rates, as patients range from newborns to teens, with some requiring gas: blood flow ratios higher than the typical 2:1 for effective carbon dioxide removal.
  • An evaluation of A.L.ONE™ ECMO oxygenators showed that increasing the gas: blood flow ratio did not lead to significant rises in gas phase pressures or cause harmful gaseous microemboli (GME) production, whether at different gas flow rates or oxygen concentrations.
  • The study concludes that, in an experimental setting, higher GBFRs do not result in increased gas phase pressures or GME release, ensuring safety in pediatric ECMO applications.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Oxygenators for paediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) are required to operate over a wide range of flow rates, in a patient group ranging from neonates through to fully grown adolescents. ECMO oxygenators typically have a manufacturer's stated maximum gas: blood flow rate (GBFR) ratio of 2:1, however, many patients require greater ratios than this for adequate CO removal. Mismatches in GBFR in theory could result in high gas phase pressures. These increased pressures in theory could cause the formation of gross gaseous microemboli (GME) placing the child at higher risk of neurological injury.

Methods: We evaluated 6 paediatric and 6 adult A.L.ONE™ ECMO oxygenators and assessed their gas phase pressures and GME release, in an ex vivo setting, in GBFR ratios up to greater than 2, across a range of gas flow (1L - 10 L/min) rates with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FO) content of 50% and 100%.

Results: There were no increases above 10 mmHg observed in gas phase pressures in GBFR >= 2:1 in either adult or paediatric oxygenators. Laboratory examination of GME activity demonstrated a small increase in post-membrane GME release over the study period. GME release was unaffected by FO setting or gas flow rate, with a maximum volume of < 6 µL in both paediatric and adult oxygenators.

Conclusions: In an ex vivo setting, increasing GBFR above 2:1 in a paediatric oxygenator, and to a GBFR of 2:1 in an adult oxygenator did not significantly increase gas phase pressures, and no oxygenator membrane rupture was observed. There were no associations between gas flow rates and GME production.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02676591241256089DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gas phase
16
phase pressures
16
gme release
12
gas flow
12
gas blood
8
flow rates
8
ecmo oxygenators
8
gas
8
flow rate
8
paediatric adult
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!