Objective: To compare the effect of propolis and gluma desensitisers on the management of dentin hypersensitivity.
Methods: The single-blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Operative Dentistry, Dr Ishrat ul Ebad Khan Institute of Oral Health Sciences, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, from October 2020 to September 2021, and comprised patients with dentin hypersensitivity who had pain scores of at least 2 on the visual analogue scale. The teeth were randomised into propolis group A and Gluma group B. Baseline pain scores were assessed using visual analogue scale and Schiff's sensitivity scores and compared with scores immediately after the intervention, and then after one week and one month of the intervention. Data was analysed using SPSS 23.
Results: Of the 22 patients, 12(54.5%) were females and 10(45.4%) were males. Of the 80 teeth, there were 40(50%) in each of the 2 groups. Significant reduction was observed in dentin hypersensitivity immediately after the application of the desensitising agents (p<0.05). However, after one month, Gluma was more effective than propolis (p<0.05).
Conclusions: Both Gluma and propolis were found to be effective desensitising agents, but the effectiveness of propolis decreased over one month.
Clinical Trial Number: Clinical Trials.gov: NCT04819867.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.9924 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Photothermal Effect and Biomineralization of Black Phosphorus Nanosheet-Composited Hydrogel Boosts Synergistic Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity.
Adv Sci (Weinh)
January 2025
Key Laboratory of Polymer Ecomaterials, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 5625 Renmin Street, Changchun, 130022, P. R. China.
Dentin hypersensitivity (DH), marked by exposed dentinal tubules, presents as a sharp toothache triggered by stimuli and subsides when the stimuli are removed. To address the limitations of current commercial desensitizers in terms of acid resistance, friction resistance, and stability, a black phosphorus nanosheet-composited methacrylate gelatin hydrogel (GelMA/BP) is developed for DH treatment, leveraging the synergistic effects of photothermal therapy and biomineralization. Incorporating the BP nanosheet provided GelMA/BP with a stable photothermal response and the continuous release of phosphate anions, which blocked dentinal tubules by converting light energy into heat and initiating biomineralization.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNano hydroxyapatite-silica with a core-shell structure for long-term management of dentin hypersensitivity.
iScience
December 2024
Stomatology Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510280, China.
Teeth undergo continuous demineralization and remineralization influenced by dietary acid and saliva. Excessive dietary acid attack disrupts this balance, exposing dentin tubules and causing dental hypersensitivity (DH). Due to low acid resistance, traditional anti-DH regents such as calcium phosphate minerals fail in long-term occlusion of dentin tubules, resulting in recurrent attacks of DH.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEfficacy and Durability of Two Desensitizing Agents on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion: An In Vitro Study.
Cureus
November 2024
Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nelllore, IND.
Background: Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is a common condition caused by exposed dentinal tubules, often requiring treatment with desensitizing agents. This in vitro study conducted at Narayana Dental College and Hospital (Nellore, AP, IND) between January 2022 and March 2022, aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of two desensitizing agents, SDI Riva Star (SDI Ltd., Bayswater, VIC, AUS) and Gluma Desensitizer (Kulzer, Hanau, DEU) in occluding dentinal tubules and their long-term durability following simulated brushing.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClinical outcomes of selective removal to soft dentin versus firm dentin for deep caries lesions: a randomized controlled trial up to 5 years.
Clin Oral Investig
December 2024
Clinic for Masticatory Disorders and Dental Biomaterials, Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the success of selective removal to soft dentine (SRSD) with or without calcium silicate (CS) and selective removal to firm dentine (SRFD) in permanent dentition.
Materials And Methods: Between November 2018 and March 2020, 165 posterior deep caries lesions in 134 patients were included in the study and randomly assigned into test (n = 101) and control (n = 64) groups. The control group (n = 46) received the treatment of SRFD with CS, while the test group was further randomized into two groups to receive SRSD with CS (n = 45) and SRSD without CS (n = 45).
Non-Invasive Strategies for Remineralization and Hypersensitivity Management in Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
J Clin Med
November 2024
Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Molar-incisor hypomineralization (MIH) is an enamel defect affecting molars and incisors, often leading to hypersensitivity, enamel breakdown, and increased caries risk. Non-invasive treatments, such as casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) and fluoride varnish, show potential in remineralizing affected enamel and reducing sensitivity, but their efficacy is still debated. This study systematically reviews and analyzes the effectiveness of CPP-ACP and other non-invasive agents in improving remineralization and reducing hypersensitivity in MIH-affected teeth.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!