A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Influence of metabolic syndrome on prognosis of patients with surgically treated esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Influence of metabolic syndrome on prognosis of patients with surgically treated esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Diabetol Metab Syndr

Department of Breast Oncology, Hainan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Hainan Medical University, 570311, Haikou City, Hainan Province, China.

Published: May 2024

Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) has been related to the increased incidence of esophageal cancer (EC). The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of MetS on prognosis of patients with surgically treated EC in a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: An extensive search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang, and CNKI to identify relevant cohort studies. Random-effects models were employed to combine the findings, taking into account the potential influence of heterogeneity.

Results: Seven cohort studies involving 4332 patients with stage I-III EC who received surgical resection were included. At baseline, 608 (14.0%) patients had MetS. Pooled results suggested that MetS were associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications (risk ratio [RR]: 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03 to 1.64, p = 0.03; I = 0%). However, the overall survival (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.52, p = 0.71; I = 80%) and progression-free survival (RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.53 to 3.00, p = 0.59; I = 80%) were not significantly different between patients with and without MetS. Subgroup analyses suggested that the results were not significantly modified by study design (prospective or retrospective), histological type of EC (squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma), or diagnostic criteria for MetS (p values indicating subgroup difference all > 0.05).

Conclusion: Although MetS may be associated with a moderately increased risk of postoperative complications in patients with EC under surgical resection, the long-term survival may not be different between patients with and without MetS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11112923PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-024-01335-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients mets
12
metabolic syndrome
8
prognosis patients
8
patients surgically
8
surgically treated
8
esophageal cancer
8
mets
8
cohort studies
8
surgical resection
8
mets associated
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!