Caffeine Expectancy Does Not Influence the Physical Working Capacity at the Fatigue Threshold.

J Strength Cond Res

Physical Therapy Program, Department of Health Care Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan; and.

Published: June 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to determine if expectations about caffeine's effects influence physical working capacity at the fatigue threshold (PWCFT) during exercise.
  • Despite participants believing they consumed caffeine, results indicated that actual caffeine intake improved performance metrics like maximal power output and PWCFT, while expectancy alone did not have a significant impact.
  • Ultimately, the findings suggest that while caffeine can enhance exercise capacity, the belief in its effectiveness (expectancy) does not contribute to mitigating neuromuscular fatigue.

Article Abstract

Ambrozy, CA, Hawes, NE, Hayden, OL, Sortzi, I, and Malek, MH. Caffeine expectancy does not influence the physical working capacity at the fatigue threshold. J Strength Cond Res 38(6): 1056-1062, 2024-The placebo effect occurs when a desired outcome is experienced due to the belief that a treatment is effective, even in the absence of an active ingredient. One explanation for this effect is based on a person's expectations of a drug or supplement. Although caffeine's effects on sports performance have been studied, little is known about how expectations of caffeine affect neuromuscular fatigue during continuous muscle action. The physical working capacity at the fatigue threshold (PWCFT) can be used to assess neuromuscular fatigue noninvasively using surface electromyography. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether caffeine expectancy influences PWCFT. We hypothesized that regardless of expectancy, caffeine consumption would delay neuromuscular fatigue. The study involved 8 healthy college-aged men (mean ± SEM: age, 25.6 ± 1.0 years) who visited the laboratory on 4 occasions, each separated by 7 days. The subjects completed 4 experimental conditions, in random order, where they were told that they were consuming caffeine or placebo and either received caffeine or placebo. After consuming the drink, the subjects remained in the laboratory for an hour and then performed an incremental exercise test. The results showed that the condition where subjects were told that they were consuming caffeine and received caffeine had significantly higher mean values for maximal power output (F(3, 21) = 11.75; p < 0.001), PWCFT (F(3, 21) = 12.28; p < 0.001), PWCFT (%maximal power output; F(3, 21) = 8.75; p < 0.001), and heart rate at end exercise (%predicted; F(3, 21) = 3.83; p = 0.025) compared with the 2 conditions where placebo was received. However, no statistically significant mean differences were found from the condition where subjects were told that they were consuming placebo but consuming caffeine. This suggests that a person's expectancy and potential somatic response may serve as a cue for how an ergogenic aid or placebo could affect subsequent performance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004742DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

caffeine expectancy
12
physical working
12
working capacity
12
capacity fatigue
12
fatigue threshold
12
neuromuscular fatigue
12
told consuming
12
consuming caffeine
12
caffeine
10
expectancy influence
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!