Objective: We investigated the accuracy of the OMRON HEM-7361T automated oscillometric blood pressure (BP) monitor in the differentiation between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm.
Methods: An approximately equal number of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and individuals with sinus rhythm were recruited from outpatients and inpatients of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China. BP was measured three times consecutively with a 30-s interval with the OMRON HEM-7361T automatic electronic BP monitor for atrial fibrillation detection. A hand-held single lead electrocardiogram device was used for simultaneous electrocardiogram recordings.
Results: The device accurately identified atrial fibrillation in 100 (99.0%) of the 101 patients, with only 1 patient incorrectly classified as non-atrial fibrillation. The device correctly identified 99 (95.2%) of the 104 participants with sinus rhythm as non-atrial fibrillation, with five participants incorrectly classified as atrial fibrillation. The device had a positive predictive value of 95.2%, negative predictive value of 99.0%, and overall accuracy of 97.1%. Among the six misclassified participants, one with atrial fibrillation had a heart rate of 65 beats/min, and four of the five participants with sinus rhythm had cardiac arrhythmias (atrial or ventricular premature beat in one participants, sinus tachycardia in one participant, and both arrhythmias in one participant).
Conclusion: The OMRON HEM-7361T BP monitor is accurate in the differentiation between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm. Whether the device is sufficiently accurate in the differentiation between atrial fibrillation and other cardiac arrhythmias remains under investigation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000706 | DOI Listing |
Europace
January 2025
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Background And Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) after cardiac surgery are common and associated with adverse outcomes. The increased risk related to AF or AFL may extend beyond discharge. This study aims to determine whether photoplethysmography (PPG)-based smartphone monitoring to detect AF or AFL after hospital discharge following cardiac surgery improves AF management.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Prev Cardiol
January 2025
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Via Commenda 19, Milan 20122, Italy.
Front Cardiovasc Med
January 2025
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent cardiac arrhythmia, with ventricular rate control being a critical therapeutic target. However, the optimal range for ventricular rate control remains unclear. Additionally, the relationship between different levels of ventricular rate control and cardiac remodeling in patients with atrial fibrillation remains unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJACC Case Rep
December 2024
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA.
An 83-year-old man with known history of atrial fibrillation presented for preoperative evaluation for elective left nephrectomy for cancer. Transthoracic echocardiogram revealed a large, free-floating, left atrial mass. Further profiling with transesophageal echocardiogram showed a free-floating mass intermittently obstructing the mitral valve.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJACC Case Rep
December 2024
Division of Cardiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
An 85-year-old woman with atrial fibrillation was found to have a large 4.5- × 3.5-cm left atrial mass.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!