Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: The complications of mobile cement spacer are common. To address these issues, a novel on-bone femoral molding device (FMD) has been developed to enhance stability between the spacer-bone. This study investigated the clinical outcomes and complications associated with this novel FMD.
Methods: The FMD was developed using a reverse engineering program with the on-bone molding concept. Five knees of 4 patients were examined. The bone status, ambulatory ability, knee range of motion, and femoral spacer complications were followed up until 3 months after the second-stage surgery.
Results: The infection was successfully treated in all patients. The interim period was 21.6 ± 4.5 weeks. The range of motion measured before the first surgery, before the second surgery, and 3 months after the second surgery was 104.2 ± 43.1, 105.8 ± 20.0, and 124.0 ± 18.5 degrees, respectively. No femoral spacer complications were observed. One knee joint subluxation and 1 minor tibial spacer fracture occurred.
Conclusions: Newly developed FMD appears safe during initial proof-of-concept in patients with stage 1 to 2B bone loss. It prevents femoral spacer complications in a specific bone defect type without causing additional bone loss and facilitates range of motion during the interim period. Precise gap assessment and appropriate tibial cement spacer thickness could prevent knee dislocation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11106837 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2024.101400 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!