AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aims to explore the experiences of patients and clinicians in diagnosing cardiovascular disease (CVD) to inform the creation of better technological solutions.
  • Through focus groups and interviews with 32 participants, four main themes emerged around diagnostic challenges: symptom interpretation, patient characteristics, patient-clinician interactions, and systemic issues.
  • Key insights suggest that while both groups face communication and time challenges, patients struggle more with psychological and ambiguous symptoms, whereas clinicians focus on individual patient differences and the importance of building rapport.

Article Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to understand stakeholder experiences of diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD) to support the development of technological solutions that meet current needs. Specifically, we aimed to identify challenges in the process of diagnosing CVD, to identify discrepancies between patient and clinician experiences of CVD diagnosis, and to identify the requirements of future health technology solutions intended to improve CVD diagnosis.

Design: Semistructured focus groups and one-to-one interviews to generate qualitative data that were subjected to thematic analysis.

Participants: UK-based individuals (N=32) with lived experience of diagnosis of CVD (n=23) and clinicians with experience in diagnosing CVD (n=9).

Results: We identified four key themes related to delayed or inaccurate diagnosis of CVD: symptom interpretation, patient characteristics, patient-clinician interactions and systemic challenges. Subthemes from each are discussed in depth. Challenges related to time and communication were greatest for both stakeholder groups; however, there were differences in other areas, for example, patient experiences highlighted difficulties with the psychological aspects of diagnosis and interpreting ambiguous symptoms, while clinicians emphasised the role of individual patient differences and the lack of rapport in contributing to delays or inaccurate diagnosis.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight key considerations when developing digital technologies that seek to improve the efficiency and accuracy of diagnosis of CVD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11110589PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080445DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diagnosis cvd
12
delayed inaccurate
8
inaccurate diagnosis
8
diagnosis cardiovascular
8
cardiovascular disease
8
cvd
8
diagnosing cvd
8
diagnosis
7
stakeholder perspectives
4
perspectives contributors
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!