AI Article Synopsis

  • Blood pressure measurement in children is critical for diagnosing hypertension, and with mercury sphygmomanometers being banned, it's essential to evaluate the accuracy of mercury-free options.
  • The study compared blood pressure measurements from mercury sphygmomanometers (MS), auscultatory devices (AD), and oscillometric devices (OD) in 104 participants aged 10-18, finding that AD showed strong concordance with MS, while OD had significant discrepancies, especially in diastolic blood pressure (DBP).
  • The findings suggest that AD may be a viable replacement for MS in hypertension screening, as it maintained close accuracy in comparison, while OD underestimated hypertension prevalence.

Article Abstract

Background And Objectives: Blood pressure (BP) measurement using an auscultatory sphygmomanometer is recommended for diagnosing hypertension in children. As mercury sphygmomanometers (MSs) are banned owing to environmental concerns, it is crucial to determine the accuracy of mercury-free sphygmomanometers to replace them. We analyzed the accuracy of these devices to guide the National Survey selection.

Methods: BP was measured thrice each with MS, auscultatory device (AD), and oscillometric device (OD) in 104 participants aged 10-18 using the National Survey data. The difference in BP was defined as the difference between MS and other devices. The BP differences, correlations, and influencing factors were analyzed. The frequencies of hypertension were also compared.

Results: Systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) differences between MS and AD were 0.88±3.36 mmHg and 0.63±3.95 mmHg, and those between MS and OD were 0.43±5.83 mmHg and 4.57±6.89 mmHg, respectively. The absolute error of <10 mmHg for DBP between MS and OD was 76%. The concordance correlation coefficient between MS and AD was 0.94 for SBP and 0.90 for DBP, and 0.81 and 0.67, respectively for MS and OD. Arm circumference negatively correlated with BP differences except for SBP between the MS and OD. The frequency of hypertension was not different between MS and AD but was underestimated by OD.

Conclusions: AD correlated well with MS, while OD did not, especially for DBP. The superiority of AD over OD suggests AD as a possible alternative for MS in the National Survey.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11109839PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2023.0274DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mercury sphygmomanometers
8
mercury-free sphygmomanometers
8
national survey
8
replacing mercury
4
sphygmomanometers
4
sphygmomanometers mercury-free
4
sphygmomanometers national
4
national health
4
health survey
4
survey children
4

Similar Publications

Background: After six cycles of using the BpTRU (BT) BPM-300 blood pressure (BP) monitor, the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) introduced the OMRON (OM) IntelliSense HEM-907XL BP monitor in Cycle 7. This study assesses differences between BP values measured by both devices in children and youth aged 6 to 17 years and whether equations could be developed to compare BP measurements taken using the two devices.

Data And Methods: In Cycle 6 (2018 to 2019) of the CHMS, BP was measured using BT and OM devices.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

How to take and record a manual blood pressure measurement.

Nurs Stand

January 2025

Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences and Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Accurate measurement of a patient's blood pressure (BP) is essential to identify hypotension or hypertension and to inform subsequent management and treatment decisions. The auscultatory, or manual, method remains the gold standard for non-invasive BP measurement, so it is vital that nurses are able to undertake this procedure accurately. This article explains how to take and record a manual BP measurement using an aneroid sphygmomanometer and a stethoscope.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Validation of blood pressure (BP) monitors in pregnant women are needed to ensure the accurate measurement of BP in pregnancy. Therefore the study aimed to evaluate the measurement accuracy of the G.LAB MD41A0 oscillometric automatic upper-arm blood pressure monitor in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia women according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The evolution of cardiovascular diagnostics has been profoundly influenced by the invention of the sphygmomanometer, a groundbreaking tool that transformed the measurement of blood pressure from an imprecise and invasive process into a routine and reliable clinical practice. Scipione Riva-Rocci, an Italian physician, developed the mercury sphygmomanometer in 1896, revolutionizing the way blood pressure was measured and managed. This simple yet innovative device, comprising an inflatable cuff, a mercury column manometer, and a stethoscope, provided the first accurate, noninvasive method for measuring blood pressure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study aimed to validate the accuracy of the test device (TMB-2296-BT) blood pressure (BP) monitor in adults according to International Standard Organization (ISO) 81060-2:2018 + Amd.1:2020 universal standard protocol, which is a digital monitor. Three trained observers used the same arm sequential method to compare the SBPs and DBPs measured by the test device with those measured by the reference device (mercury sphygmomanometer).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!