AI Article Synopsis

  • Self-collected gargle specimens show promise as an alternative to traditional swabs for detecting influenza A viruses, but have lower detection rates.
  • A study comparing gargle specimens to standard nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs found an 85% agreement rate, with swabs being more sensitive and efficient in detecting the virus.
  • Despite reduced sensitivity, gargle specimens provide a convenient option for testing, particularly in emergency situations, but swabs are still the preferred method for reliable results.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Self-collected specimens are increasingly being used as alternatives to swab-based methods for the detection of respiratory viruses. While saliva is well accepted, gargle specimens are a potential alternative with characteristics that are more favorable for laboratory handling. This study assessed the performance of gargle specimens in the detection of influenza A viruses (IAVs).

Patients And Methods: We performed a prospective head-to-head comparison between combined nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs (NPS&OPS) and purified water gargle (PWG) among adult outpatients with febrile respiratory symptoms to detect IAVs using real-time RT-PCR during two influenza seasons.

Results: During study periods 1 (July 13 to 26, 2022, H3N2 predominated) and 2 (February 25 to March 10, 2023, H1N1 pdm09 predominated), a total of 459 patients were recruited. The overall agreement between the NPS&OPS and PWG was 85.0% (390/459, κ = 0.697), with 88.0% in period 1 and 82.6% in period 2. The detection rate of IAVs in PWG (51.6%, 237/459) was lower than that in NPS&OPS (62.3%, 286/459) (p < 0.0001). The overall sensitivity and specificity were 96.6% (93.7-98.3%) and 100% (97.1-100%) in NPS&OPS and were 80.1% (75.0-84.4%) and 100% (97.1-100%) in PWG, respectively. Among the 227 pairs of concordant positive specimens, cycle threshold (Ct) values were significantly lower in NPS&OPS than in PWG (median Ct values: 24.2, 28.2, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Although self-collected PWG specimens offer acceptable performance for IAVs molecular testing, NPS&OPS remain a reliable option. Given the convenience of collection, nonviscous gargles are recommended for viral detection during emergencies or under specific conditions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11102144PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S450991DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

purified water
8
water gargle
8
detection influenza
8
real-time rt-pcr
8
gargle specimens
8
nps&ops pwg
8
lower nps&ops
8
100% 971-100%
8
nps&ops
6
pwg
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!