AI Article Synopsis

  • The study used the UK's National Endoscopy Database to evaluate if feedback on polyp detection rates could improve endoscopists' performance during colonoscopies.
  • It involved a randomized trial with 541 endoscopists across 36 centers, where those in the intervention group received monthly performance reports based on behavior change theories.
  • Although there was no significant increase in the average number of polyps detected, there were notable improvements in overall polyp detection rates during the intervention, particularly among those who actively engaged with the feedback, but these gains did not carry over after the intervention.

Article Abstract

Background & Aims: Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates are higher for endoscopists with low polyp detection rates. Using the UK's National Endoscopy Database (NED), which automatically captures real-time data, we assessed if providing feedback of case-mix-adjusted mean number of polyps (aMNP), as a key performance indicator, improved endoscopists' performance. Feedback was delivered via a theory-informed, evidence-based audit and feedback intervention.

Methods: This multicenter, prospective, NED Automated Performance Reports to Improve Quality Outcomes Trial randomized National Health Service endoscopy centers to intervention or control. Intervention-arm endoscopists were e-mailed tailored monthly reports automatically generated within NED, informed by qualitative interviews and behavior change theory. The primary outcome was endoscopists' aMNP during the 9-month intervention.

Results: From November 2020 to July 2021, 541 endoscopists across 36 centers (19 intervention; 17 control) performed 54,770 procedures during the intervention, and 15,960 procedures during the 3-month postintervention period. Comparing the intervention arm with the control arm, endoscopists during the intervention period: aMNP was nonsignificantly higher (7%; 95% CI, -1% to 14%; P = .08). The unadjusted MNP (10%; 95% CI, 1%-20%) and polyp detection rate (10%; 95% CI, 4%-16%) were significantly higher. Differences were not maintained in the postintervention period. In the intervention arm, endoscopists accessing NED Automated Performance Reports to Improve Quality Outcomes Trial webpages had a higher aMNP than those who did not (aMNP, 118 vs 102; P = .03).

Conclusions: Although our automated feedback intervention did not increase aMNP significantly in the intervention period, MNP and polyp detection rate did improve significantly. Engaged endoscopists benefited most and improvements were not maintained postintervention; future work should address engagement in feedback and consider the effectiveness of continuous feedback.

Clinical Trials Registry:  www.isrctn.org ISRCTN11126923 .

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2024.03.048DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

polyp detection
16
performance feedback
8
ned automated
8
automated performance
8
performance reports
8
reports improve
8
improve quality
8
quality outcomes
8
outcomes trial
8
intervention
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!