AI Article Synopsis

  • A survey conducted in February 2023 examined the use of proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer across 30 U.S. proton therapy centers, with an 83% response rate from 25 centers.
  • Out of these, only 8 centers (32%) offered prostate SBRT, with the rest citing reasons like lack of clinical need, volumetric imaging, and clinical evidence as deterrents.
  • Common practices among the centers providing SBRT included utilizing Hydrogel spacers, MRI for target delineation, and consistent treatment planning; however, there was no consensus on patient selection criteria.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To report the current practice pattern of the proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate treatments.

Materials And Methods: A survey was designed to inquire about the practice of proton SBRT treatment for prostate cancer. The survey was distributed to all 30 proton therapy centers in the United States that participate in the National Clinical Trial Network in February, 2023. The survey focused on usage, patient selection criteria, prescriptions, target contours, dose constraints, treatment plan optimization and evaluation methods, patient-specific QA, and image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) methods.

Results: We received responses from 25 centers (83% participation). Only 8 respondent proton centers (32%) reported performing SBRT of the prostate. The remaining 17 centers cited 3 primary reasons for not offering this treatment: no clinical need, lack of volumetric imaging, and/or lack of clinical evidence. Only 1 center cited the reduction in overall reimbursement as a concern for not offering prostate SBRT. Several common practices among the 8 centers offering SBRT for the prostate were noted, such as using Hydrogel spacers, fiducial markers, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for target delineation. Most proton centers (87.5%) utilized pencil beam scanning (PBS) delivery and completed Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) phantom credentialing. Treatment planning typically used parallel opposed lateral beams, and consistent parameters for setup and range uncertainties were used for plan optimization and robustness evaluation. Measurements-based patient-specific QA, beam delivery every other day, fiducial contours for IGRT, and total doses of 35 to 40 GyRBE were consistent across all centers. However, there was no consensus on the risk levels for patient selection.

Conclusion: Prostate SBRT is used in about 1/3 of proton centers in the US. There was a significant consistency in practices among proton centers treating with proton SBRT. It is possible that the adoption of proton SBRT may become more common if proton SBRT is more commonly offered in clinical trials.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11095093PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpt.2024.100020DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

proton sbrt
16
proton centers
16
radiation therapy
12
sbrt prostate
12
proton
11
centers
10
sbrt
9
stereotactic body
8
body radiation
8
united states
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!