Pivot: partisan policy responses to COVID-19 health disparities.

Health Aff Sch

Department of Public and Ecosystem Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, United States.

Published: December 2023

How did partisanship influence rhetoric about, public opinion of, and policies that prioritize racial and ethnic health disparities of COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic between March and July 2020? In this retrospective, mixed-methods analysis using national administrative and survey data, we found that the rhetoric and policy of shared sacrifice diminished and partisan differences in pandemic policy increased once it became clear to political elites that there were major racial disparities in COVID-19 cases and deaths. We trace how first disparities emerged in data and then were reported in elite, national media, discussed in Congress, and reflected in public opinion. Once racial disparities were apparent, partisan divides opened in media, public opinion, and legislative activity, with Democrats foregrounding inequality and Republicans increasingly downplaying the pandemic. This temporal dimension, focusing on how the diffusion of awareness of inequalities among elites shaped policy in the crucial months of early 2020, is the principal novel finding of our analysis. Overall, there is a clear, partisan policy response to addressing COVID-19 racial disparities across media, public opinion, subnational legislative activity, and congressional deliberations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10986205PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxad054DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

public opinion
16
racial disparities
12
partisan policy
8
health disparities
8
disparities covid-19
8
media public
8
legislative activity
8
disparities
6
policy
5
pivot partisan
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!