AI Article Synopsis

  • The IMpower210 study examined the effectiveness and safety of atezolizumab versus docetaxel as second-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in East Asian patients.
  • Key eligibility included adults with advanced NSCLC who had disease progression after platinum-based chemotherapy and were randomized to receive either treatment.
  • Results showed that atezolizumab offered a median overall survival of 12.3 months compared to 9.9 months for docetaxel, but the study did not meet its main survival goal, although atezolizumab had significantly fewer severe side effects.

Article Abstract

Objective: IMpower210 (NCT02813785) explored the efficacy and safety of single-agent atezolizumab docetaxel as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in East Asian patients.

Methods: Key eligibility criteria for this phase III, open-label, randomized study included age ≥18 years; histologically documented advanced NSCLC per the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (7th edition); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; and disease progression following platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either atezolizumab (1,200 mg) or docetaxel (75 mg/m). The primary study endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor expression (ITT -WT) and in the overall ITT population.

Results: Median OS in the ITT -WT population (n=467) was 12.3 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 10.3-13.8] months in the atezolizumab arm (n=312) and 9.9 (95% CI, 7.8-13.9) months in the docetaxel arm [n=155; stratified hazard ratio (HR), 0.82; 95% CI, 0.66-1.03]. Median OS in the overall ITT population was 12.5 (95% CI, 10.8-13.8) months with atezolizumab treatment and 11.1 (95% CI, 8.4-14.2) months (n=377) with docetaxel treatment (n=188; stratified HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71-1.08). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 18.4% of patients in the atezolizumab arm and 50.0% of patients in the docetaxel arm.

Conclusions: IMpower210 did not meet its primary efficacy endpoint of OS in the ITT -WT or overall ITT populations. Atezolizumab was comparatively more tolerable than docetaxel, with a lower incidence of grade 3/4 TRAEs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11090799PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2024.02.01DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

itt -wt
12
phase iii
8
atezolizumab docetaxel
8
east asian
8
non-small cell
8
cell lung
8
lung cancer
8
itt population
8
-wt itt
8
median itt
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!