Reliability of the Walch Classification for Characterization of Primary Glenohumeral Arthritis: A Systematic Review.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg

From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Schaefer, and Trent), the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD (Haislup, Sequeira, Tarapore, Lindsey, and Murthi), and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri (Wright).

Published: September 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The Walch classification is used to assess glenohumeral arthritis but has shown low and inconsistent reliability across studies.
  • A systematic review of literature analyzed the reliability of this classification based on different imaging methods and modifications, including intraobserver and interobserver evaluations.
  • Thirteen articles were reviewed, revealing that reliability scores varied significantly, with no clear patterns linked to imaging modality or the experience level of the raters.

Article Abstract

Introduction: The Walch classification has been widely accepted and further developed as a method to characterize glenohumeral arthritis. However, many studies have reported low and inconsistent measures of the reliability of the Walch classification. The purpose of this study was to review the literature on the reliability of the Walch classification and characterize how imaging modality and classification modifications affect reliability.

Methods: A systematic review of publications that included reliability of the Walch classification reported through intraobserver and interobserver kappa values was conducted. A search in January 2021 and repeated in July 2023 used the terms ["Imaging" OR "radiography" OR "CT" OR "MRI"] AND ["Walch classification"] AND ["Glenoid arthritis" OR "Shoulder arthritis"]. All clinical studies from database inception to July 2023 that evaluated the Walch or modified Walch classification's intraobserver and/or interobserver reliability were included. Cadaveric studies and studies that involved subjects with previous arthroplasty, shoulder débridement, glenoid reaming, interposition arthroplasty, and latarjet or bankart procedure were excluded. Articles were categorized by imaging modality and classification modification.

Results: Thirteen articles met all inclusion criteria. Three involved the evaluation of plain radiographs, 10 used CT, two used three-dimensional (3D) CT, and four used magnetic resonance imaging. Nine studies involved the original Walch classification system, five involved a simplified version, and four involved the modified Walch. Six studies examined the reliability of raters of varying experience levels with none reporting consistent differences based on experience. Overall intraobserver reliability of the Walch classifications ranged from 0.34 to 0.92, and interobserver reliability ranged from 0.132 to 0.703. No consistent trends were observed in the effect of the imaging modalities or classification modifications on reliability.

Discussion: The reliability of the Walch classification remains inconsistent, despite modification and imaging advances. Consideration of the limitations of the classification system is important when using it for treatment or prognostic purposes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-01086DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

walch classification
28
reliability walch
24
classification
11
walch
10
reliability
9
glenohumeral arthritis
8
systematic review
8
imaging modality
8
modality classification
8
classification modifications
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to evaluate how patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) differ based on the appropriateness of anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), using RAND/UCLA criteria.
  • A total of 390 patients were assessed, classified as "appropriate," "inconclusive," or "inappropriate," showing that those deemed appropriate had significantly better improvement in post-op scores and were more likely to achieve clinically important outcomes.
  • The findings support the use of the RAND/UCLA criteria for determining aTSA candidacy, indicating that appropriate patients tend to benefit more from the surgery while complications were similar across all classifications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This retrospective study investigated associations of rotator cuff muscle atrophy (MA) and fatty infiltration (FI) with glenoid morphology.

Methods: Patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis who presented to Penn State Bone and Joint Institute's orthopaedic clinic from September 2002 to December 2019 as total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) candidates were evaluated. MA was determined by the cross-sectional area of each rotator cuff muscle on pre-operative MR and CT scans.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Wearable devices have become commonplace tools for tracking behavioral and physiological parameters in real-world settings. Nonetheless, the practical utility of these data for clinical and research applications, such as sleep analysis, is hindered by their noisy, large-scale, and multidimensional characteristics. Here, we develop a neural network algorithm that predicts sleep stages by tracking topological features (TFs) of wearable data and model-driven clock proxies (CPs) reflecting the circadian propensity for sleep.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty(rTSA) continue to expand making it challenging to predict whether patients will benefit more from anatomic TSA(aTSA) or rTSA. The purpose of this study was to determine which factors differ between aTSA and rTSA patients that achieve meaningful outcomes and may influence surgical indication.

Methods: Random Forest dimensionality reduction was applied to reduce 23 features into a model optimizing substantial clinical benefit (SCB) prediction of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon score using 1117 consecutive patients with 2-year follow up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Evidence indicates that mental health factors, such as anxiety and depression, significantly impact comfort and capability levels in patients with shoulder osteoarthritis more than the severity of the condition itself.
  • A study involving 1,342 patients showed that higher pain intensity and lower capability were linked to worse mental health symptoms and specific demographic factors, including gender and age.
  • The research concluded that comfort and capability variations were not influenced by the severity of the disease (Walch classification) or social health factors, emphasizing the importance of addressing mental health in treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!