AI Article Synopsis

  • Nucleic acid amplification testing is the leading method for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics, but false positives can occur; this study investigates the characteristics of these false positive results.
  • In the study, retesting classified specimens as true positives (true positive based on retesting, rTP) or false positives (false positive based on retesting, rFP) based on N-gene and S-gene detection.
  • The findings indicate that a significant portion of initially positive results were false positives, with specific cycle threshold (CT) values that could help differentiate true from false positives, suggesting further retesting for samples that exceed these values or only show a single target.

Article Abstract

Background: Nucleic acid amplification testing is the gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics, although it may produce a certain number of false positive results. There has not been much published about the characteristics of false positive results. In this study, based on retesting, specimens that initially tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 were classified as true or false positive groups to characterize the distribution of cycle threshold (CT) values for N1 and N2 targets and number of targets detected for each group.

Methods: Specimens that were positive for N-gene on retesting and accompanied with S-gene were identified as true positives (true positive based on retesting, rTP), while specimens that retested negative were classified as false positives (false positive based on retesting, rFP).

Results: Of the specimens retested, 85/127 (66.9%) were rFP, 16/47 (34.0%) specimens with both N1 and N2 targets initially detected were rFP, and the CT values for each target was higher in rFP than in rTP. ROC curve analysis showed that optimal cutoff values of CT to differentiate between rTP and rFP were 34.8 for N1 and 33.0 for N2. With the optimal cutoff values of CT for each target, out of the 24 specimens that were positive for both N1 and N2 targets and classified as rTP, 23 (95.8%) were correctly identified as true positives. rFP specimens had a single N1 target in 52/61 (85.2%) and a single N2 target in 17/19 (89.5%). Notably, no true positive results were obtained from any specimens with only N2 target detected.

Conclusions: These results suggest that retesting should be performed for positive results with a CT value greater than optimal cutoff value for each target or with a single N1 target amplified, considering the possibility of a false positive. This may provide guidance on indications to perform retesting to minimize the number of false positives.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2023.231214DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

false positive
24
positive
12
based retesting
12
optimal cutoff
12
single target
12
false
8
positive sars-cov-2
8
number false
8
specimens
8
specimens positive
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!