Background: The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the risk of tooth loss for teeth adjacent and nonadjacent to dental implants.
Methods: A total of 787 patients with an average follow-up of 57.1 months were examined to define the tooth loss, cumulative survival rate, and odds ratio (OR) for teeth adjacent versus nonadjacent to implants. A multivariate logistic regression was employed to assess the association between dental history and various recorded etiologies of tooth loss among teeth adjacent to implants.
Results: The incidence of tooth loss for teeth adjacent to implants was 8.1% at the tooth level and 15.1% at the patient level, while 0.7% and 9.5% at the tooth and patientlevel for teeth nonadjacent to implants. The 10-year cumulative survival rate for teeth adjacent to implants was 89.2%, and the primary etiology of tooth loss was root fracture (45.2%). The risk of tooth loss among teeth adjacent versus nonadjacent to implants was significantly higher (OR 13.15). Among teeth adjacent to implants, root canal-treated teeth had a significantly higher risk of tooth loss due to root fracture (OR 7.72), a history of existing restoration significantly increased the risk of tooth loss due to caries (OR 3.05), and a history of periodontitis significantly increased the risk of tooth loss due to periodontitis (OR 38.24).
Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that after patients received dental implant treatment, teeth adjacent to implants showed a 13.2-fold higher risk of tooth loss compared to teeth nonadjacent to implants, with the primary etiology being root fracture.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JPER.23-0739 | DOI Listing |
J Dent
December 2024
Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ). Rodolpho Paulo Rocco, 325, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. ZIP Code: 21941-617. Electronic address:
Objectives: To identify and map the literature on the current state of pH-triggered strategies for resin-based materials used in direct restorative dentistry, focusing on innovative compounds, their incorporation and evaluation methods, and the main outcomes.
Data And Sources: Through a search across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, LILACS, Cochrane Library databases, and Google Scholar, this review identified studies pertinent to pH-responsive dental materials, excluding resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
Study Selection: From the 981 records identified, 19 in vitro studies were included, concentrating on resin-based composite resins (50%), dentin adhesives (25%), and sealants (25%).
Spec Care Dentist
December 2024
Department of Public Health, School of Health Sciences and Practice, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Objective: Examining the association between oral health and the prevalence of falls among US caregivers.
Background: There is a scarcity of research on the association between oral health status and the prevalence of falls among older adults and caregivers.
Materials And Methods: Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) surveys from 2016 to 2020 were analyzed.
J Clin Periodontol
December 2024
National Dental Research Institute Singapore, National Dental Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Aim: To estimate the causal effects of smoking and cessation on tooth loss using instrumental variable (IV) analysis.
Material And Methods: Data from the Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), conducted from 1995 to 2006, 2008, 2010, and 2012 in 50 U.S.
BMC Oral Health
December 2024
Division of Community and Family Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-City, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Background: Tooth loss can lead to an increased risk of physical disease and a reduced quality of life. The current study investigated the association of the use of interdental cleaning devices with oral health outcomes such as tooth loss among employees as a healthier population.
Method: Tooth loss was determined as the main outcome in 2017 in a company employee population (n = 845, average age = 47.
BMC Oral Health
December 2024
Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, 3302 Gaston Avenue, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
Background: Oral diseases remain a significant public health problem worldwide, with growing gaps in oral health status among various socioeconomic groups. The objective of the current study is to analyze the impact of different social determinants of health (SDOH) on oral health outcomes (frequency of dental visits, self-reported oral health status, embarrassment because of oral health status, and tooth loss) among a representative sample of United States (U.S.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!