AI Article Synopsis

  • Hot snare excision using electrocautery is common for large colorectal polyps but can cause deep thermal injuries; thus, there is a need for less invasive options, particularly for polyps sized 10-14 mm.
  • A new technique called low-power pure-cut current hot snare polypectomy (LPPC HSP) aims to reduce thermal damage while maintaining effectiveness.
  • A study comparing LPPC HSP and traditional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) showed similar results in terms of resection ability and safety for 10-14 mm polyps, indicating that LPPC HSP is a viable and safe alternative to EMR.

Article Abstract

Background And Aim: Hot snare excision using electrocautery is widely used for large colorectal polyps (>10 mm); however, adverse events occur due to deep thermal injury. Colorectal polyps measuring 10-14 mm rarely include invasive cancer. Therefore, less invasive therapeutic options for this size category are demanding. We have developed hot snare polypectomy with low-power pure-cut current (LPPC HSP), which is expected to contribute to less deep thermal damage and lower risk of adverse events. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LPPC HSP for 10-14 mm colorectal polyps, compared with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).

Methods: In this multicenter, retrospective, observational study, clinical outcomes of EMR and LPPC HSP for 10-14 mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps between January 2021 and March 2022 were compared using propensity score matching.

Results: We identified 203 EMR and 208 LPPC HSP cases. After propensity score matching, the baseline characteristics between the groups were comparable, with 120 pairs. The en bloc and R0 resection rates were not significantly different between EMR and LPPC HSP groups (95.8% vs 97.5%, P = 0.72; 90.0% vs 91.7%, P = 0.82). The rates of delayed bleeding and perforation did not differ between the groups.

Conclusions: Compared with conventional EMR, LPPC HSP showed a similar resection ability without an increase in adverse events. These results suggest that LPPC HSP is a safe and effective treatment for 10-14 mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16616DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lppc hsp
28
colorectal polyps
24
hot snare
12
adverse events
12
emr lppc
12
low-power pure-cut
8
snare polypectomy
8
multicenter retrospective
8
deep thermal
8
hsp 10-14 mm
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Hot snare excision using electrocautery is common for large colorectal polyps but can cause deep thermal injuries; thus, there is a need for less invasive options, particularly for polyps sized 10-14 mm.
  • A new technique called low-power pure-cut current hot snare polypectomy (LPPC HSP) aims to reduce thermal damage while maintaining effectiveness.
  • A study comparing LPPC HSP and traditional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) showed similar results in terms of resection ability and safety for 10-14 mm polyps, indicating that LPPC HSP is a viable and safe alternative to EMR.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is widely performed for small colorectal polyps. However, small colorectal polyps sometimes include high-grade adenomas or carcinomas that require endoscopic resection with electrocautery. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel resection technique, hot snare polypectomy with low-power pure-cut current (LPPC-HSP) for small colorectal polyps, compared with CSP and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!