Practice-induced SNARC: evidence from a null-SNARC sample.

Cogn Process

Department of Psychology, Izmir University of Economics, 35330, Balçova, Izmir, Turkey.

Published: November 2024

The mental representation of numbers inherently involves a spatial organization, often positioning smaller numbers to the left and larger numbers to the right. The SNARC effect, characterized by faster responses to small numbers using the left hand and vice versa for large numbers, is typically attributed to this left-to-right oriented mental number line (MNL). However, the direction of the SNARC effect seems to rely on reading direction, with most research exploring these mechanisms conducted within left-to-right reading cultures where the SNARC effect is prevalent. This study takes advantage of a sample from a left-to-right reading culture that does not exhibit the SNARC effect, allowing us to isolate and elucidate the stand-alone effects of recent experiences on SNARC. Therefore, the current study aims to investigate how MNL-compatible and MNL-incompatible practices induce an effect within a sample lacking the SNARC effect. To accomplish this, we reinvited the individuals from the sample which had previously shown no SNARC, and retested those who agreed to take part in the current study after an MNL-compatible or MNL-incompatible practice manipulation. The findings revealed an absence of the SNARC effect with MNL-compatible practices. Conversely, MNL-incompatible practices yielded a reverse SNARC effect. These results prompt a discussion on SNARC mechanisms within the framework of practice effects.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10339-024-01198-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

snarc
10
numbers left
8
left-to-right reading
8
current study
8
mnl-compatible mnl-incompatible
8
mnl-incompatible practices
8
numbers
5
practice-induced snarc
4
snarc evidence
4
evidence null-snarc
4

Similar Publications

The Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) effect refers to the phenomenon of faster left-hand responses to smaller numbers and faster right-hand responses to larger ones. The current study examined the possible long-lasting effects of magnitude-relevant stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) practices on the SNARC effect in a transfer paradigm. Participants performed a magnitude classification task including either SNARC-compatible or SNARC-incompatible trials as practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Numbers are associated with space, but it is unclear how flexible these associations are. We investigated whether the SNARC effect (Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes; Dehaene . 1993 .

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Spatial-Numerical Associations (SNAs) refer to the demonstrations of spatial processing of numbers. The Mental Number Line (MNL) is a representation model describing numbers as aligning left-to-right (LR) and was suggested to account for directional biases in participants' responses during numerical tasks. One common behavioral demonstration of this is the Spatial-Numerical Associations of Response Codes (SNARC) effect, which describes faster left-/right-hand responses to smaller/larger numbers, respectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The spatial numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect demonstrates that people respond faster to small numbers with their left hand and faster to large numbers with their right hand. The size congruity effect (SCE) refers to the fact that congruent trials between numerical values and physical sizes are faster than incongruent trials. Previous studies have found that the SNARC effect and SCE are independent when magnitudes or sizes are processed explicitly.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Dichotomous horizontal representation of acute deterioration risk on illnesses.

Sci Rep

December 2024

Department of Human Sciences [Psychology], Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami-Osawa, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo, 192-0397, Japan.

Article Synopsis
  • Research on the interaction of spatial information and perceived risks, like the SNARC effect, shows inconsistent left-to-right representations of risk among individuals.
  • The study involved registered nurses and college students who assessed the risk levels of illnesses by pressing buttons to indicate comparisons to a standard stimulus, with their reaction times recorded.
  • While no overall spatial-risk association was found, approximately half of the participants had a left-to-right representation of risk, and the other half had a right-to-left representation, indicating that individuals may perceive acute deterioration risks differently based on personal or situational factors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!