Impact of Lipoprotein(a) Levels on Cardiovascular Risk Estimation.

High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev

Department of Cardiology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Perón 4190, C1199ABB, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Published: July 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • A novel cardiovascular risk (CVR) calculator has been developed that includes Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels to provide a more accurate assessment of cardiovascular risk.
  • In a study of 671 patients, high Lp(a) levels were found in 22.7% of the cases, leading to a significant increase in lifetime and 10-year CVR for two-thirds of the participants.
  • Reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) or systolic blood pressure (SBP) effectively compensated for the increased risk associated with Lp(a) levels in a large proportion of patients.

Article Abstract

Introduction: A new cardiovascular risk (CVR) calculator that incorporates Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels has recently been designed.

Aims: To estimate CVR using the new score and to identify the reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) or systolic blood pressure (SBP) necessary to balance the risk attributable to Lp(a).

Methods: CVR throughout life and at 10 years was estimated with the new score in patients in primary prevention, both considering and not considering the value of Lp(a). When the estimated risk considering Lp(a) levels exceeded the baseline risk, the reduction in LDL-C levels or SBP necessary to balance the risk attributable to Lp(a) was calculated.

Results: In total, 671 patients (mean age 54.2 years, 47.2% women) were included. Globally, 22.7% of the population had high Lp(a) values (> 50 mg/dL or > 125 nmol/L). When calculating CVR throughout life and considering the Lp(a) value, the global risk increased in 66.7% of cases (median 19.3%). Similar results were observed when we assessed the 10-year risk. The risk associated with Lp(a) could be completely compensated by decreasing LDL-C (average 21 mg/dL) or SBP (average 6.3 mmHg) in 79.2% and 74.7% of cases, respectively.

Conclusion: When calculating the CVR with the new score, two-thirds and one-third of the population were bidirectionally recategorized as 'up' or 'down,' respectively. The decrease in LDL-C or SBP mitigated the increased risk caused by Lp(a) levels across a substantial proportion of patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40292-024-00649-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

considering lpa
12
risk
10
cardiovascular risk
8
cvr score
8
sbp balance
8
balance risk
8
risk attributable
8
cvr life
8
lpa levels
8
calculating cvr
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!