AI Article Synopsis

  • Lebrikizumab, an antibody targeting IL-13, showed effectiveness in treating moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adolescents during three Phase 3 trials (ADvocate1, ADvocate2, ADhere).
  • The analysis focused on 16-week outcomes from these trials, evaluating both physician and patient-reported improvements in symptoms like itching and sleep loss.
  • Results indicated significant improvements in clinical measures for adolescents receiving lebrikizumab compared to placebo, reinforcing its potential as an effective treatment option for AD.

Article Abstract

Background: Lebrikizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody targeting IL-13, previously demonstrated clinical efficacy in three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trials that included adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD): ADvocate1, ADvocate2, and ADhere.

Aim: This subset analysis evaluated 16-week physician- and patient-reported outcomes of lebrikizumab in the adolescent patients enrolled in these three trials.

Methods: Eligible adolescents (≥12 to <18 years weighing ≥40kg) were randomized 2:1 to subcutaneous lebrikizumab (500 mg loading doses at baseline and Week 2 followed by 250 mg every 2 weeks) or placebo as monotherapy in ADvocate1&2, and in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) in the ADhere study. Week 16 analyses included clinical efficacy outcomes (IGA (0,1) with ≥2-point improvement, EASI 75, EASI 90), patient-reported Pruritus NRS ≥4-point improvement and Sleep-Loss Scale ≥2-point improvement.

Results: Pooled ADvocate1&2 16-week results in lebrikizumab ( = 67) vs placebo ( = 35) were: IGA (0,1) 46.6% vs 14.3% ( < 0.01), EASI 75 62.0% vs 17.3% ( < 0.001), EASI 90 40.7% vs 11.5% ( < 0.01), Pruritus NRS 48.9% vs 13.1% ( < 0.01), and Sleep-Loss Scale 26.9% vs 6.9% ( = 0.137). Corresponding results for ADhere, (lebrikizumab + TCS,  = 32; placebo + TCS,  = 14), were consistent.

Conclusions: Lebrikizumab treatment demonstrated efficacy in improving the signs and symptoms of AD in adolescent patients, consistent with the ADvocate and ADhere overall population results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2024.2324833DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lebrikizumab adolescent
8
adolescent patients
8
moderate-to-severe atopic
8
atopic dermatitis
8
three randomized
8
efficacy lebrikizumab
4
patients moderate-to-severe
4
dermatitis 16-week
4
16-week three
4
randomized phase
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Emerging evidences have underscored the positive impact of biologics on asthmatic patients. However, there is a pressing need to verify their therapeutic efficacy in children and adolescents with asthma. To address this, we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biologics in the asthma management of this demographic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Lebrikizumab, an IL-13 immunomodulator, has shown recommendable effectiveness and safety in clinical studies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adolescents and adults.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD through a meta-analysis.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Medline, and ClinicalTrials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of lebrikizumab when combined with topical corticosteroids in Japanese patients aged 12 and older with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).
  • Conducted over 16 weeks, the Phase 3 trial involved 286 participants who were randomly assigned to receive either lebrikizumab (administered every 2 or 4 weeks) or a placebo, with results showing significantly higher rates of improvement in skin condition among those receiving lebrikizumab.
  • The treatment was found to have a good safety profile, with serious adverse events being rare, though some mild to moderate side effects were more common in the lebrikizumab groups compared to the placebo
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * A network meta-analysis reviewed 16 studies involving 8,462 patients, focusing on their improvement in pruritus after using various treatments, with positive results noted for systemic therapies compared to placebo.
  • * Upadacitinib 30 mg was found to be the most effective treatment for pruritus, with other effective options including abrocitinib, dupilumab, and lebrikizumab, though further research is necessary for definitive comparisons.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!