A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Performance comparison of parameter estimation techniques for the quantitation of local cerebral blood flow by dynamic positron computed tomography. | LitMetric

Local CBF (LCBF) can be quantitated from positron computed tomographic (PCT) data and physiologically based mathematical models by several general methods. Those using a dynamic sequence of PCT scans allow the simultaneous estimation of both LCBF and p, the indicator's tissue-blood partition coefficient. This article presents a comparison of three rapid estimation techniques for use with inert diffusible radioindicators and serial PCT, each of which is based on the original Kety model. One method, developed in our laboratory, involves minimizing the mean squared discrepancy between measured data and model predictions, whereas the other two methods, recently reported in the literature, are weighted integration techniques that involve multiplying the measured data by time-dependent weighting functions. Simulation studies of noise propagation and other sources of error were performed under a variety of simulated conditions. Functional images of LCBF and p were calculated using each method for both phantom and human subject data. Errors can differ by as much as a factor of 2-3 between methods, with each having its own unique advantages and disadvantages.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.1985.29DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

estimation techniques
8
positron computed
8
measured data
8
performance comparison
4
comparison parameter
4
parameter estimation
4
techniques quantitation
4
quantitation local
4
local cerebral
4
cerebral blood
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!