Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Nosocomial wound infection with (PA) is a serious complication often responsible for septic mortality of burn patients. High-intensity antimicrobial blue light (aBL) treatment may represent an alternative therapy for PA infections. Antibacterial effects of an light-emitting diode (LED) array (450-460 nm; 300 mW/cm; 15/30 min; 270/540J/cm) against PA were determined by suspension assay, biofilm assay, and a human skin wound model and compared with 15-min topically applied 3% citric acid (CA) and wound irrigation solution (Prontosan; PRT). The aBL reduced the bacterial number (2.51-3.56 log CFU/mL), whereas PRT or CA treatment achieved a 4.64 or 6.60 log CFU/mL reduction in suspension assays. The aBL reduced biofilm formation by 60%-66%. PRT or CA treatment showed reductions by 25% or 13%. In this study, aBL reduced bacterial number in biofilms (1.30-1.64 log CFU), but to a lower extent than PRT (2.41 log CFU) or CA (2.48 log CFU). In the wound skin model, aBL (2.21-2.33 log CFU) showed a bacterial reduction of the same magnitude as PRT (2.26 log CFU) and CA (2.30 log CFU). The aBL showed a significant antibacterial efficacy against PA and biofilm formation in a short time. However, a clinical application of aBL in wound therapy requires effective active skin cooling and eye protection, which in turn may limit clinical implementation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pho.2023.0180 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!