Interpretation of SPECT wall motion with deep learning.

J Nucl Cardiol

Department of Medicine (Cardiology), University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Canada. Electronic address:

Published: July 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Researchers developed a deep learning (DL) workflow aimed at improving the interpretation of wall motion in single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).
  • The study included 1,038 patients and used echocardiography as a benchmark to train DL models, which outperformed human readers and traditional quantitative methods in diagnosing abnormal wall motion.
  • Findings indicated that the DL model provided quicker and more accurate assessments, suggesting its potential as a valuable tool in clinical settings for SPECT analysis.

Article Abstract

Objectives: We sought to develop a novel deep learning (DL) workflow to interpret single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) wall motion.

Background: Wall motion assessment with SPECT is limited by image temporal and spatial resolution. Visual interpretation of wall motion can be subjective and prone to error. Artificial intelligence (AI) may improve accuracy of wall motion assessment.

Methods: A total of 1038 patients undergoing rest electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated SPECT and echocardiography were included. Using echocardiography as truth, a DL-model (DL-model 1) was trained to predict the probability of abnormal wall motion. Of the 1038 patients, 317 were used to train a DL-model (DL-model 2) to assess regional wall motion. A 10-fold cross-validation was adopted. Diagnostic performance of DL was compared with human readers and quantitative parameters.

Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy (ACC) of DL model (AUC: .82 [95% CI: .79-.85]; ACC: .88) were higher than human (AUC: .77 [95% CI: .73-.81]; ACC: .82; P < .001) and quantitative parameter (AUC: .74 [95% CI: .66-.81]; ACC: .78; P < .05). The net reclassification index (NRI) was 7.7%. The AUC and accuracy of DL model for per-segment and per-vessel territory diagnosis were also higher than human reader. The DL model generated results within 30 seconds with operable guided user interface (GUI) and therefore could provide preliminary interpretation.

Conclusions: DL can be used to improve interpretation of rest SPECT wall motion as compared with current human readers and quantitative parameter diagnosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2024.101881DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wall motion
24
spect wall
8
deep learning
8
1038 patients
8
dl-model dl-model
8
auc [95%
8
wall
7
motion
6
interpretation spect
4
motion deep
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!