Importance: In newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), disease progression due to acquired resistance to first- or second-generation BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors is common. Ponatinib inhibits BCR::ABL1 and all single-mutation variants, including T315I.
Objective: To compare frontline ponatinib vs imatinib in adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL.
Design, Setting, And Participants: Global registrational, phase 3, open-label trial in adults aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. From January 2019 to May 2022, eligible patients at 77 sites were randomized 2:1 to ponatinib (30 mg/d) or imatinib (600 mg/d) with reduced-intensity chemotherapy, followed by single-agent ponatinib or imatinib after the cycle 20 phase of the trial. The last date of follow-up for this analysis was August 12, 2022.
Intervention: Patients received ponatinib, 30 mg/d, or imatinib, 600 mg/d, with reduced-intensity chemotherapy, followed by single-agent ponatinib or imatinib after cycle 20. The ponatinib dose was reduced to 15 mg on achievement of minimal residual disease-(MRD) negative complete remission.
Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary end point of this interim analysis was MRD-negative complete remission (≤0.01% BCR::ABL1 [MR4] centrally assessed by reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction), with complete remission maintained for at least 4 weeks at the end of cycle 3. The key secondary end point was event-free survival.
Results: Of 245 patients randomized (median age, 54 years; 133 [54.3%] female), 232 (ponatinib, n = 154; imatinib, n = 78) who had p190 or p210 dominant isoforms verified by the central laboratory were analyzed for the primary end point. The MRD-negative complete remission rate (primary end point) was significantly higher with ponatinib (34.4% [53/154]) vs imatinib (16.7% [13/78]) (risk difference, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.06-0.29]; P = .002). At the data cutoff, event-free survival had not met the prespecified number of events. Median event-free survival was not reached in the ponatinib group and was 29 months in the imatinib group. The most common adverse events were similar between treatment groups. Arterial occlusive events were infrequent and comparable between groups (ponatinib, 2.5%; imatinib, 1.2%).
Conclusions And Relevance: Ponatinib demonstrated a superior rate of MRD-negative complete remission at the end of induction vs imatinib when combined with reduced-intensity chemotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. The safety profile of ponatinib was comparable with imatinib.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03589326.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11082750 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.4783 | DOI Listing |
Pharmaceuticals (Basel)
October 2024
Departamento de Síntese de Fármacos, Instituto de Tecnologia em Fármacos, Farmanguinhos-Fiocruz, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro 21041-250, RJ, Brazil.
The primary treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) involves first- and second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as imatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, and dasatinib. However, these medications are ineffective against mutations in the kinase domain of the ABL1 protein, particularly in the protein with the T315I mutation. To address this, ponatinib (PNT), a third-generation inhibitor, was developed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiomedicines
October 2024
Hematology Department, IBSAL-University Hospital of Salamanca, Department of Medicine and Cancer Research Center (CIC), University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has changed the natural history of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and the transformation from the chronic phase to the blast phase (BP) is currently an uncommon situation. However, it is one of the major remaining challenges in the management of this disease, as it is associated with dismal outcomes. We report the case of a 63-year-old woman with a history of CML with poor response to imatinib who progressed to myeloid BP-CML, driven by the acquisition of t(8;21)(q22;q22)/.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFComput Biol Chem
December 2024
Bioinformatics Lab (Dry), Department of Statistics, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi 6205, Bangladesh. Electronic address:
Hematol Transfus Cell Ther
August 2024
Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika, Kraków, Poland.
The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia vastly improving the prognosis and clinical outcome of most patients. It was estimated that approximately 40-50 % of patients treated with imatinib will require treatment with a second-generation or third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor to achieve an optimal response. The treatment duration, increased patient survival, and aging of the population receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors raise concerns as to long-term toxicities, such as an elevated cardiovascular risk and a higher rate of comorbidities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Pharmacol
September 2024
Immunopathology and Viral Reservoir Unit, National Center of Microbiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!