The Diuretic Comparison Project (DCP)1 was a real world study planned to evaluate in a pragmatic manner whether Chlorthalidone (CTD), as compared with Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), would reduce the risk of major nonfatal cardiovascular disease outcomes in elderly hypertensive participants (≥65 years) who were receiving HCTZ (25 or 50 mg) at baseline. This study being a real world study lacks the robustness of a randomized controlled trial. The principle limitation being unequal exposure of the two diuretics, prolonged unknown duration of exposure to HCTZ vs a short exposure to CTD (Median 2.4 years). In the high risk population with history of MI/Stroke, CTD conferred a lower risk of primary outcome as compared to low risk population where no significant difference in outcome was seen in both diuretics. Other factors included, lack of established dose equivalency of the two diuretics and absence of use of 12.5 mg HCTZ in older hypertensives. : Pareek A, Messerli FH, Ram CVS. Chlorthalidone vs Hydrochlorothiazide for Hypertension-CV Events: Did the Design Influence the Outcome? J Assoc Physicians India 2023;71(10):93-93.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.59556/japi.71.0328DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chlorthalidone hydrochlorothiazide
8
hydrochlorothiazide hypertension-cv
8
hypertension-cv events
8
events design
8
design influence
8
influence outcome?
8
real study
8
risk population
8
outcome? diuretic
4
diuretic comparison
4

Similar Publications

Importance: Hypertension is a risk factor for the development and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is unclear whether different thiazide diuretics have a differential impact on kidney outcomes.

Objective: To compare kidney outcomes in patients with hypertension taking chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Characteristics of VA hospitals by participation status in a large pragmatic embedded clinical trial.

Contemp Clin Trials

January 2025

Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • The Diuretic Comparison Project (DCP) was a pragmatic trial in the VA healthcare system that compared two diuretics, chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide, to see which better prevents major cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients.
  • The study analyzed data from participating and non-participating medical centers to determine factors influencing their decision to join, including socio-economic status and hospital performance metrics.
  • Findings revealed that urban centers, those with higher incomes, and hospitals with prior research experience were more likely to participate, suggesting that improving engagement with lesser-involved facilities could enhance future recruitment for clinical trials.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The variance between guideline recommendations and real-world usage might stem from the perception that chlorthalidone poses a higher risk of adverse effects, although there is no clear evidence of disparities in cardiovascular outcomes. It is crucial to assess both the clinical cardiovascular effects and adverse reactions of both drugs for clinical guidance. In this study, we present a comprehensive and updated analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of chlorthalidone (CHLOR) versus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases through lower the blood pressure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[The delapril-indapamide combination in treatment of arterial hypertension: practical implications in light of the new guidelines.].

Recenti Prog Med

October 2024

Dipartimento di Cardiologia, Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia, Perugia.

The recent guidelines issued by the European Society of Hypertension reaffirmed that the degree of control of hypertension remains suboptimal worldwide. In order to increase the proportion of well-controlled patients, in addition to nonpharmacological measures, it is necessary to improve the implementation of drug therapy in the clinical practice as much as possible. Initial therapy should almost always be based on the combination, free or fixed, between ACE inhibitor drugs, or direct angiotensin II inhibitors ('sartans') and diuretics (thiazide or thiazide-like) or calcium channel blockers at the maximum recommended and well-tolerated dose.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Although diuretic-induced Acute Pancreatitis (AP) cases are typically mild to moderate, severe and potentially fatal occurrences can arise. Case Series and Literature Review: We have, herein, presented a series of diuretic-induced AP cases from March 2018 to February 2024 of a 54-year-old woman treated with chlorthalidone, a 45-year-old male treated with hydrochlorothiazide, and a 48-year-old male treated with frusemide. The literature search has identified 26 cases published to date, 10 from frusemide and 16 from thiazide diuretics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!