AI Article Synopsis

  • - The review investigates the use of emergency front-of-neck airway access (eFONA) techniques, like cricothyroidotomy, for treating cardiac arrest when standard airway methods fail to ensure oxygenation.
  • - A comprehensive search of medical databases yielded 69 relevant studies, but only one was a randomized controlled trial, revealing a total of 4,457 eFONA attempts among varied patient populations, with significant differences in study results.
  • - Ultimately, the findings highlight a lack of focused research on eFONA in cardiac arrest patients, indicating a need for more standardized studies to better understand its effectiveness and safety.

Article Abstract

Background: Airway management is a core component of the treatment of cardiac arrest. Where a rescuer cannot establish a patent airway to provide oxygenation and ventilation using standard basic and advanced airway techniques, there may be a need to consider emergency front-of-neck airway access (eFONA, e.g., cricothyroidotomy), but there is limited evidence to inform this approach.

Objectives: This scoping review aims to identify the evidence for the use of eFONA techniques in patients with cardiac arrest.

Methods: In November 2023, we searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central to identify studies on eFONA in adults. We included randomised controlled trials, non-randomised studies, and case series with at least five cases that described any use of eFONA. We extracted data, including study setting, population characteristics, intervention characteristics, and outcomes. Our analysis focused on four key areas: incidence of eFONA, eFONA success rates, clinical outcomes, and complications.

Results: The search identified 21,565 papers, of which 18,934 remained after de-duplication. After screening, we included 69 studies (53 reported incidence, 40 reported success rate, 38 reported clinical outcomes; 36 studies reported complications). We identified only one randomised controlled trial. Across studies, there was a total of 4,457 eFONA attempts, with a median of 31 attempts (interquartile range 16-56.5) per study. There was marked heterogeneity across studies that precluded any pooling of data. There were no studies that included only patients in cardiac arrest.

Conclusion: The available evidence for eFONA is extremely heterogeneous, with no studies specifically focusing on its use in adults with cardiac arrest.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11074978PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100653DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cardiac arrest
12
emergency front-of-neck
8
scoping review
8
efona
8
evidence efona
8
patients cardiac
8
studies
8
randomised controlled
8
clinical outcomes
8
studies reported
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!