AI Article Synopsis

  • Cerebral vasospasm (CV) is a serious complication after a brain hemorrhage, and endovascular therapy, especially intra-arterial vasodilator infusion (IAVI), is being evaluated as a new treatment option.
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis found that patients receiving endovascular therapy had significantly lower in-hospital mortality rates compared to those who received standard treatment, although other long-term recovery measures showed no significant difference.
  • Patients undergoing endovascular therapy experienced longer stays in the ICU and total hospital time, suggesting that while it may reduce mortality, it may lead to increased healthcare resource use.

Article Abstract

Background: Cerebral vasospasm (CV) is a common complication of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), leading to increased morbidity and mortality rates. Endovascular therapy, particularly intra-arterial vasodilator infusion (IAVI), has emerged as a potential alternative treatment for CV.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the efficacy of endovascular therapy with standard treatment in patients with CV following aSAH. The primary outcomes assessed were in-hospital mortality, discharge favorable outcome, and follow-up favorable outcome. Secondary outcomes included major infarction on CT, ICU stay duration, and total hospital stay.

Results: Regarding our primary outcomes of interest, patients undergoing intervention exhibited a significantly lower in-hospital mortality compared to the standard treatment group, with the intervention group having only half the mortality risk (RR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.29, 0.83],  = 0.008). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of discharge favorable outcome (RR = 0.99, 95% CI [0.68, 1.45],  = 0.963) and follow-up favorable outcome (RR = 1.09, 95% CI [0.86, 1.39],  = 0.485). Additionally, there was no significant difference in major infarction rates (RR = 0.79, 95% CI [0.34, 1.84],  = 0.588). It is important to note that patients undergoing endovascular treatment experienced longer stays in the ICU (MD = 6.07, 95% CI [1.03, 11.12],  = 0.018) and extended hospitalization (MD = 5.6, 95% CI [3.63, 7.56],  < 0.001). Subgroup analyses based on the mode of endovascular treatment further supported the benefits of IAVI in lowering in-hospital mortality (RR = 0.5, 95% CI [0.27, 0.91],  = 0.023).

Conclusion: Endovascular therapy, particularly IAVI, holds promising potential in reducing in-hospital mortality for patients with CV following aSAH. However, it did not show significant improvement in long-term prognosis and functional recovery. Further research with larger sample sizes and randomized controlled trials is necessary to validate these findings and optimize the treatment strategy for cerebral vasospasm in aSAH patients.

Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42023451741.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11075757PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1360511DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

favorable outcome
16
endovascular therapy
12
efficacy endovascular
8
cerebral vasospasm
8
aneurysmal subarachnoid
8
subarachnoid hemorrhage
8
systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8
standard treatment
8
primary outcomes
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!