Applying the Common-Sense Self-Regulation Model to Understand Illness Representations of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in College Students.

J Head Trauma Rehabil

Communication Sciences and Special Education, University of Georgia, Athens (Drs Kemp and O'Brien and Ms Neese); Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Ms Norton); and Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota (Dr O'Brien).

Published: May 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explores how cognitive, emotional, and social factors affect college students' understanding of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and their health-related decisions.
  • Participants, consisting of 458 students, evaluated different injury scenarios to gauge their perception and recommended actions for mTBI.
  • Results indicate that students are more inclined to recognize mTBI and seek healthcare when the injury is perceived to happen to a friend rather than themselves, with variations in recommended actions depending on the injury cause.

Article Abstract

Objective: The Common Sense Model (CSM) describes cognitive, emotional, and psychosocial factors that influence how health threats are processed and subsequently inform health-related decisions or actions. The purpose of this study was to examine psychosocial factors influencing coherence, or usefulness, of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) representations and their relationship to health-related decisions and actions.

Setting: Public university.

Participants: There were 458 graduate and undergraduate college students who participated in a web-based survey (mean age = 22 years; SD = 3.6).

Design: A mixed-methods design randomized participants into 2 groups to examine perceptions of mTBI across differing injury mechanisms, or causes, by comparing actions recommended to a friend (Other; n = 214) with those generated for self (Self; n = 244).

Main Measures: Seven common injury mechanisms representative of university student mTBI experiences were presented as vignettes (cause). Each vignette included open- and closed-ended questions framed from CSM constructs (identity, consequences, action plans, timeline, and social context). Data were analyzed using a series of chi-square tests and multiple analysis of variance. Post hoc analysis identified differences in the injury vignettes.

Results: Students were more likely to identify the injury as mTBI ( = 8.62, P = .035) and recommend immediate healthcare (F1,415 = 316.89, P < .001) for all causes if the injury occurred to a friend as compared with themselves. Action plans also varied by cause, with post hoc analysis revealing a higher likelihood of healthcare seeking for motor vehicle crashes and assault and a lower likelihood for falls while intoxicated. Students were generally more likely to talk to closest confidants than doctors (F8,398 = 33.66, P < .001).

Conclusion: Cause appears to be a key construct in generating illness representations and associated action plans for seeking care, with lower perceived severity causes (eg, falls) resulting in little to no health-seeking action. In addition, social support appears to be important for college students when making decisions about their health.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000892DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

college students
12
action plans
12
illness representations
8
mild traumatic
8
traumatic brain
8
brain injury
8
psychosocial factors
8
health-related decisions
8
injury mtbi
8
injury mechanisms
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!