Evaluation of airway responsiveness and pulmonary function test results among obese and non-obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

Objective: In this research, we aimed to elucidate the effect of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and obesity on pulmonary volumes and bronchial hyperreactivity, and particularly the effect of supine position on pulmonary volume and functions.

Patients And Methods: This was a prospective, cross-sectional study with a total of 96 patients (age range, 20-65 years). Based on the body mass index (BMI) and Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) scores, the patients were divided into four groups: Group 1: AHI≥15/h, BMI≥30 kg/m2 (n=24), Group 2: AHI≥15/h, BMI<30 kg/m2 (n=24), Group 3: AHI<15/h, BMI≥30 kg/m2 (n=24), and Group 4: AHI<15/h, BMI<30 kg/m2 (n=24). All patients first had static and dynamic pulmonary function tests and carbon monoxide diffusion tests (TLco and Kco) in the sitting and supine positions. A bronchial provocation test with methacholine was applied to all patients in the sitting position one day later. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multivariate linear regression was used in the statistical analysis.

Results: Airway responsiveness was observed in 4 of the patients included in the study, and there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. A statistically significant decrease was observed in forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), total lung capacity (TLC) and functional residual capacity (FRC), especially in  Group 1 in sitting position compared to Group 4 (p=0.001, p=0.001, p=0.025, p=0.043, and p=0.001, respectively). Changes in pulmonary functions in the transition from sitting to a supine position did not show any significant difference in the study groups (p<0.05). We observed no difference in the diffusion capacity in the sitting and supine positions among the groups (p<0.05).

Conclusions: The severity of AHI and BMI particularly affect the lower airway, but changes in the position did not show any significant difference in the study groups.