A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Detection of Dural Defect Localization Using 4-Dimensional Dynamic Computed Tomography Myelography for Patients with Superficial Siderosis. | LitMetric

Background: There are cases of superficial siderosis (SS) with spinal ventral fluid-filled collection in the spinal canal. In our previous study, the balanced steady-state free precession sequence magnetic resonance imaging is useful in identifying the location of dural defects. However, because of its narrow scan area and long scan time, it cannot easily detect the defect location in some patients with small dural defect. In this study, we applied 4-dimensional (4D) dynamic computed tomography (CT) imaging, including time-axis imaging, to myelography using the latest CT imaging equipment, which can perform short-time continuous imaging, to identify the dural defect site.

Methods: Twenty SS patients with ventral fluid-filled collection in the spinal canal (9 males, 11 females; mean age 61.6 years) underwent 4D dynamic CT myelography. A 192-row helical CT (SOMATOM Force, SIEMENS, Munich, Germany) with high-speed scanning capability was used to obtain 9-11 scans per minute at low dose while passing contrast medium into the subarachnoid space. Then, contrast leakage sites were identified.

Results: The contrast leakage sites could be identified in all 20 cases: C7/Th1, 2 cases; Th1/2, 5 cases; Th2/3, 9 cases; Th3/4, 1 case; Th5/6, 1 case; Th7/8, 1 case; and Th8/9, 1 case. Eighteen cases underwent surgical operation, and actual dural defects were confirmed at the contrast leakage sites. The mean ± standard deviation of leakage time from contrast agent injection was 19.0 ± 9.2 s.

Conclusions: The 4D dynamic CT myelography can be used to reliably identify the location of spinal fluid leakage. In SS cases, dural defects could be visualized in an average of 19 seconds.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.167DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dural defect
12
dural defects
12
contrast leakage
12
leakage sites
12
4-dimensional dynamic
8
dynamic computed
8
computed tomography
8
superficial siderosis
8
ventral fluid-filled
8
fluid-filled collection
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!