The presence of arsenic in groundwater, and through this in drinking water, has been shown to present a serious risk to public health in many regions of the world. In this study, two iron-rich carbonous adsorbents were compared for the removal of arsenate (As(V)) from groundwater. Biochars (FeO-biochar and FeO-pyrochar) derived from biomass waste were functionalised in two different ways with iron chloride for comparation. Batch and dynamic parameters were optimised to achieve >99% As(V) removal efficiency. Experimental data were best described by the pseudo-second order kinetic model, while multi-stage diffusion appeared to limit mass transfer of As(V). Among the isotherm models evaluated, the Freundlich model best described the experimental results with high correlation coefficients (R ≥ 0.94) for both adsorbents. Monolayer adsorption capacities were found to be 4.34 mg/g and 8.66 mg/g for FeO-biochar and FeO-pyrochar, respectively. Batch studies followed by instrumental characterisation of the materials indicated the removal mechanisms involved to be electrostatic interactions (outer-sphere), OH ligand exchange (inner-sphere complexation) and hydrogen bonding with functional groups. Higher pH (9.1), S (167.2 m/g), and iron/elemental content for the FeO-pyrochar (compared with the FeO-biochar) suggested that both surface chemistry and porosity/surface area were important in adsorption. Dynamic studies showed FeO-pyrochar can be used to remove As(V) from groundwater even at low 'environmental' concentrations relevant to legislative limits (<10 μg/L), whereby 7 g of FeO-pyrochar was able to treat 5.4 L groundwater.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142205DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

asv groundwater
8
feo-biochar feo-pyrochar
8
best described
8
comparison carbonaceous
4
carbonaceous supported
4
supported fe-rich
4
fe-rich adsorbents
4
adsorbents arsenate
4
removal
4
arsenate removal
4

Similar Publications

Geogenic arsenic (As) contamination in groundwater poses a significant public health risk in many regions worldwide. Previous studies have reported hydrogen peroxide (HO) concentrations ranging from 5.8 to 96 μmol L in rainwater, which may contribute to the oxidation and removal of As.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Arsenic (As) enrichment in groundwater stems from natural and hydrogeochemical factors, leading to geological contamination. Groundwater and surface water are interconnected, allowing As migration and surface water contamination. The As contamination poses health risks through contaminated water consumption.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Influence of calcium carbonate on ferrihydrite bio-transformation and associated arsenic mobilization/redistribution.

Environ Pollut

December 2024

State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Integrated Surface Water-Groundwater Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.

The sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB)-induced ferrihydrite transformation is an important cause for arsenic (As) contamination in the aquifer near mining area. Calcium carbonate (CaCO) is widespread and has the potential of regulating As fate directly or indirectly. However, the influence of CaCO on ferrihydrite transformation and the associated As mobilization/redistribution in SRB-containing environments remains unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Excavations for urban development can lead to soil and groundwater contamination with geogenic arsenic (As), necessitating effective management strategies due to the large volume of soil being moved annually.
  • The study analyzed soil samples from Tokyo’s Yurakucho and Kanto Loam Formations, finding higher total arsenic concentrations and water-soluble As in the Yurakucho Formation compared to the Kanto Loam Formation.
  • It identified that arsenic is mostly found in sulfide forms in the Yurakucho Formation, emphasizing the need to understand arsenic’s chemical forms to evaluate its environmental risks during excavation processes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study focuses on thermophile microorganisms in geothermal sites, particularly microbial communities in fumaroles, which are temporary habitats with intermittent water presence.
  • Metabarcoding analysis revealed that Archaea, particularly Thermoproteota, dominated in the hot spring samples, while Bacteria showed high diversity with significant representation of thermophiles and Cyanobacteriota in biofilms.
  • The research found that environmental factors like pH and temperature play distinct roles in shaping these communities, influencing bacterial diversity positively and negatively affecting archaeal diversity, especially in dry versus wet fumarole conditions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!