Purpose: Multiple interventions have been implemented to reduce opioid prescribing in upper extremity surgery. However, few studies have evaluated pain relief and patient satisfaction as related to failure of these protocols. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of limited and nonopioid ("opioid-sparing") regimens for upper extremity surgery as it pertains to patient satisfaction, pain experienced, and need for additional refills/rescue analgesia.
Methods: We aimed to systematically review randomized controlled trials of opioid-sparing approaches in upper extremity surgery. An initial search of studies evaluating opioid-sparing regimens after upper extremity surgery from the elbow distal yielded 1,320 studies, with nine meeting inclusion criteria. Patient demographics, surgery type, postoperative pain regimen, satisfaction measurements, and number of patients inadequately treated within each study were recorded. Outcomes were assessed using descriptive statistics.
Results: Nine randomized controlled trials with 1,480 patients were included. Six of nine studies (67%) reported superiority or equivalence of pain relief with nonopioid or limited opioid regimens. However, across all studies, 4.2% to 25% of patients were not adequately treated by the opioid-sparing protocols. This includes four of seven studies (57%) assessing number of medication refills or rescue analgesia reporting increased pill consumption, refills, or rescue dosing with limited/nonopioid regimens. Five of six studies (83%) reporting satisfaction outcomes found no difference in satisfaction with pain control, medication strength, and overall surgical experience using opioid-sparing regimens.
Conclusions: Opioid-sparing regimens provide adequate pain relief for most upper extremity surgery patients. However, a meaningful number of patients on opioid-sparing regimens required greater medication refills and increased use of rescue analgesia. These patients also reported no difference in satisfaction compared with limited/nonopioid regimens.
Type Of Study/level Of Evidence: Therapeutic II.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.02.007 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Insights into the identification, prevention, and treatment of neurovascular compromise in upper extremity surgery are provided in this chapter, focusing on commonly encountered injuries susceptible to intraoperative or postoperative issues. The authors highlight the importance of knowledge of anatomy, meticulous dissection, and preparation to navigate complex surgical scenarios effectively. Furthermore, proactive approaches to managing difficult situations encountered during surgery are outlined, emphasizing timely recognition and decisive action.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLateral epicondylitis, de Quervain tenosynovitis, and trigger finger are among the most common tendinopathies of the upper extremity. Lateral epicondylitis is a common condition that can be very frustrating to patients. Many patients will improve without any acute interventions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExtensor tendon injuries are commonly encountered after trauma. These injuries often result in acute weakness and have widely differing treatment options depending on the severity and the location of the injury within the upper extremity. Zone I injuries can often be treated nonoperatively with the potential for pinning of any large bony avulsion fragments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTendinopathies around the hand and wrist are common. Most are diagnosed easily with a thorough history and clinical examination. Common conditions involving the hand and wrist include trigger finger, de Quervain tenosynovitis, intersection syndrome, third and fourth extensor compartment tenosynovitis, extensor carpi ulnaris tendinitis, and flexor carpi radialis tendinitis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPatient- and Provider-Perceived Barriers to Reconstructive Surgery for Patients With Upper Limb Spasticity.
J Hand Surg Am
January 2025
Division of Hand Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Clinical Investigation Facility, Travis Air Force Base, CA. Electronic address:
Purpose: The benefits of upper-extremity reconstructive surgery for patients with spastic deformities are well documented, but a small portion of eligible patients undergo surgery. We sought to determine perceptions of upper-extremity reconstructive surgery among brain injury patients and nonsurgical providers to identify potential barriers to surgical evaluation.
Methods: Electronic medical records at a referral center were reviewed for patients diagnosed with upper limb spasticity following brain injury.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!