AI Article Synopsis

  • The 2015 forest fires in Indonesia caused significant air pollution, prompting an investigation into their impact on healthcare visits for respiratory issues.
  • The study utilized satellite data and health records from over 200 districts to assess changes in healthcare utilization, focusing on young children and differences between urban and rural areas.
  • Findings showed increased primary care visits for respiratory problems in urban children, but overall hospital care visits were negatively impacted in rural areas, highlighting disparities in healthcare access during crises.

Article Abstract

Background: The forest fires that ravaged parts of Indonesia in 2015 were the most severely polluting of this century but little is known about their effects on health care utilization of the affected population. We estimate their short-term impact on visit rates to primary and hospital care with particular focus on visits for specific smoke-related conditions (respiratory disease, acute respiratory tract infection (ARTI) and common cold).

Method: We estimate the short-term impact of the 2015 forest fire on visit rates to primary and hospital care by combining satellite data on Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) with administrative records from Indonesian National Health Insurance Agency (BPJS Kesehatan) from January 2015-April  2016. The 16 months of panel data cover 203 districts in the islands of Sumatra and Kalimantan before, during and after the forest fires. We use the (more efficient) ANCOVA version adaptation of a fixed effects model to compare the trends in healthcare use of affected districts (with AOD value above 0.75) with control districts (AOD value below 0.75). Considering the higher vulnerability of children's lungs, we do this separately for children under 5 and the rest of the population adults (> 5), and for both urban and rural areas, and for both the period during and after the forest fires.

Results: We find little effects for adults. For young children we estimate positive effects for care related to respiratory problems in primary health care facilities in urban areas. Hospital care visits in general, on the other hand, are negatively affected in rural areas. We argue that these patterns arise because accessibility of care during fires is more restricted for rural than for urban areas.

Conclusion: The severity of the fires and the absence of positive impact on health care utilization for adults and children in rural areas indicate large missed opportunities for receiving necessary care. This is particularly worrisome for children, whose lungs are most vulnerable to the effects. Our findings underscore the need to ensure ongoing access to medical services during forest fires and emphasize the necessity of catching up with essential care for children after the fires, particularly in rural areas.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11067070PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-024-01079-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

forest fires
16
health care
16
rural areas
16
hospital care
12
care
11
2015 forest
8
care utilization
8
estimate short-term
8
short-term impact
8
visit rates
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!