Importance of Baseline Fluorescein Angiography for Patients Presenting to Tertiary Uveitis Clinic.

Am J Ophthalmol

Spencer Center for Vision Research, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA (I.K., A.B., H.G., X.L., Z.X.T., C.Y., A.A., N.Y., G.U.K., N.T.T.T., Y.S., A.S.G., A.K., S.S.M., J.-H.H., C.O., D.V.D., Q.D.N.). Electronic address:

Published: September 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to determine if ultra-wide-field fluorescein angiography (UWFFA) at the initial visit impacts the evaluation of disease activity and management in patients at a uveitis clinic.
  • A total of 158 patient visits were analyzed, with assessments made using clinical exams, UWFFP, SD-OCT, and UWFFA, comparing evaluations with and without UWFFA.
  • Results showed that UWFFA led to a significant increase in identifying active disease and resulted in management changes for over a quarter of the eyes evaluated, highlighting its importance in uveitis assessment.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To ascertain whether the use of ultra-wide-field fluorescein angiography (UWFFA) at baseline visit alters the assessment of disease activity and localization, as well as the management of patients presenting to a tertiary uveitis clinic.

Design: Retrospective comparison of diagnostic approaches.

Methods: Baseline visits of 158 patients who presented to the Uveitis Clinic at the Byers Eye Institute at Stanford between 2017 and 2022 were evaluated by 3 uveitis-trained ophthalmologists (I.K., A.B., and H.G.). Each eye had undergone clinical examination along with ultra-wide-field fundus photography (UWFFP) (Optos Plc), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT, Spectralis Heidelberg, Heidelberg Engineering) and UWFFA (Optos Plc) at the baseline visit. Investigators were asked to successively determine disease activity, localization of disease (anterior, posterior or both), and management decisions based on clinical examination and UWFFP and SD-OCT (Set 1) and Set 1 plus UWFFA (Set 2). The primary outcome was the percentage of eyes whose management changed based on the availability of UWFFA compared with Set 1.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 46.9 ± 22.4 years (range, 7-96), and 91 (57.6%) were female. With Set 1 alone, 138 eyes (55.2%) were found to have active disease; localization was anterior in 58 eyes (42.0%), posterior in 53 eyes (38.4%), and anterior + posterior in 27 eyes (19.6%). With Set 2, 169 eyes of 107 patients had active anterior, posterior, or panuveitis. In comparison with Set 1, assessment with Set 2 identified additional 31 eyes (18.3%) with active disease (P = .006) and an additional 31 eyes (18.3%) having disease in both anterior + posterior segments (P < .001). Regarding the primary outcome, management was changed in 68 eyes (27.4%) in Set 2 compared with Set 1.

Conclusions: Baseline UWFFA may alter assessment of disease activity, localization, and management decisions compared with clinical examination with only UWFFP and SD-OCT for eyes with uveitis. Thus, UWFFA may be considered as an essential tool in the evaluation of patients with uveitis at the baseline visit.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2024.04.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anterior posterior
16
baseline visit
12
disease activity
12
activity localization
12
clinical examination
12
set
10
eyes
10
fluorescein angiography
8
patients presenting
8
presenting tertiary
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!