A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Antibiotic Treatment Has No Influence on Anal Fistula Formation and Recurrent Perianal Abscess After Incision and Drainage of Cryptogenic Perianal Abscess: A Randomized Single-Blinded Prospective Study. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated whether antibiotics influence the development of anal fistulas after surgery for perianal abscesses, hypothesizing that they do not have an effect.
  • Conducted as a single-blinded randomized trial, patients were divided into two groups: one received antibiotics post-surgery and the other did not, with outcomes measured over one year.
  • Results showed no significant difference in the formation of anal fistulas (16.3% vs 10.2%) or recurrent abscesses (9.2%) between the two groups, concluding that antibiotics do not impact these complications.

Article Abstract

Background: Anal fistula commonly appears after incision and drainage of a perianal abscess. Theoretically, a fistula develops as a consequence of the infection process. Antibiotic treatment was suggested to decrease the possibility of fistula development.

Objective: We hypothesized that antibiotic treatment has no influence on the development of anal fistula after surgical treatment of perianal abscess.

Design: A single-blinded randomized prospective study.

Settings: Patients with primary cryptogenic abscesses were eligible to participate.

Patients: Patients were divided into 2 groups. Patients in group I received amoxicillin 875 mg/clavulanic acid 125 mg during 7 days after surgery, and patients in group II received no antibiotics. The study database included demographics and clinical and laboratory data.

Main Outcome Measures: Patients were examined in our outpatient clinic 2 weeks, 4 months, and 1 year after surgery, and a telephone questionnaire was performed 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome was the formation of anal fistula. The secondary outcome was recurrent perianal abscess.

Results: Overall, 98 patients completed the study. Groups were not different in inclusion. Anal fistula was diagnosed in 16 patients (16.3%) in group I (treatment group) and 10 patients (10.2%) in group II (control group; p = 0.67). Nine patients (9.2%) developed recurrent perianal abscess, 4 in the treatment group and 5 in the control group ( p = 0.73).

Limitations: A relatively small number of patients were treated in a single medical center.

Conclusion: Antibiotic therapy has no influence on anal fistula or recurrent perianal abscess formation after incision and drainage of perianal abscess. See Video Abstract .

El Tratamiento Con Antibiticos No Tiene Influencia En La Formacin De Fstula Anal Y En El Absceso Perianal Recurrente Despus De La Incisin Y Drenaje De Un Absceso Perianal Criptognico Un Estudio Prospectivo Aleatorizado, Simple Ciego: ANTECEDENTES:La fístula anal comúnmente aparece después de la incisión y drenaje de un absceso perianal. Teóricamente, la fístula se desarrolla como consecuencia del proceso infeccioso. Se sugirió tratamiento antibiótico para disminuir la posibilidad de desarrollo de fístula.OBJETIVO:Hipotetizamos que el tratamiento con antibióticos no tiene influencia en el desarrollo de fístula anal después del tratamiento quirúrgico del absceso perianal.DISEÑO:Estudio prospectivo, aleatorio, simple ciego.AJUSTE Y PACIENTES:Los pacientes con absceso criptogénico primario fueron elegibles para participar. Los pacientes se dividieron en dos grupos. Los pacientes del Grupo I recibieron amoxicilina 875 mg/ácido clavulánico 125 mg durante los 7 días posteriores a la cirugía y los pacientes del Grupo II no recibieron antibióticos. La base de datos del estudio incluyó datos demográficos, clínicos y de laboratorio.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los pacientes fueron examinados en nuestra clínica ambulatoria 2 semanas, cuatro meses y 1 año después de la cirugía y se realizó un cuestionario telefónico 6 meses después de la cirugía. El resultado primario fue la formación de una fístula anal. El resultado secundario fue el absceso perianal recurrente.RESULTADOS:En total, 98 pacientes completaron el estudio. Los grupos no fueron diferentes en cuanto a la inclusión. Se diagnosticó fístula anal en 16 (16,3%) pacientes del Grupo I (grupo de tratamiento) y 10 (10,2%) pacientes del Grupo II (grupo control) (p = 0,67). Nueve pacientes (9,2%) desarrollaron absceso perianal recurrente, 4 en el grupo de tratamiento y 5 en el grupo control (p = 0,73).LIMITACIONES:Número relativamente pequeño de pacientes tratados en un solo centro médico.CONCLUSIÓN:La terapia con antibióticos no tuvo influencia sobre la fístula anal o la formación de absceso perianal recurrente después de la incisión y drenaje del absceso perianal. (Traducción - Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy ).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003334DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

absceso perianal
28
anal fistula
24
perianal abscess
24
fístula anal
20
recurrent perianal
16
pacientes del
16
del grupo
16
perianal
15
antibiotic treatment
12
anal
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!