AI Article Synopsis

  • Recent trials of anti-amyloid-β antibodies for Alzheimer's disease showed similar effect sizes but raised concerns due to high rates of adverse events and reliance on non-reactive saline as a placebo.
  • Unlike previous antibody trials that were less reactive and ineffective, these new trials suggest potential bias in results, potentially overstating their benefits.
  • The data indicates that while these antibodies reduce amyloid, they also increase a specific form of amyloid-β in cerebrospinal fluid, suggesting a need to rethink their effectiveness and explore alternative treatment strategies.

Article Abstract

Three recent anti-amyloid-β antibody trials for Alzheimer's disease reported similar effect sizes, used non-reactive saline as placebo, and showed large numbers of adverse events including imaging anomalies (ARIA) that correlate with cognitive changes. Conversely, all previous antibody trials were less reactive and pronounced ineffective. We argue that these observations point to unblinding bias, inflating apparent efficacy and thus altering the risk-benefit balance. Further, we highlight data demonstrating that beyond reducing amyloid, monoclonal antibodies increase monomeric amyloid-β42 in cerebrospinal fluid, which may explain potential benefits. We should recalibrate the efficacy of these antibodies and devote more resources into strategies beyond removing amyloid.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-240171DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

antibody trials
8
recalibrating risk-benefit
4
risk-benefit profiles
4
profiles lecanemab
4
lecanemab donanemab
4
donanemab scales
4
scales immunoreactivity
4
immunoreactivity changes
4
changes amyloid-β42
4
amyloid-β42 three
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!