AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates sex differences in outcomes among recipients of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICDs), noting that historically, women have been underrepresented in such trials.
  • Using a multicenter international registry, researchers compared 399 females to a matched cohort of males, focusing on the rate of appropriate shocks and device complications over time.
  • Results showed that women had a lower rate of appropriate shocks compared to men (1.7% vs. 3.4% per year), but no significant difference in device-related complications, indicating that while women are less likely to receive effective ICD therapy, they face no increased risk of adverse effects from the devices.

Article Abstract

Aims: Women have been historically underrepresented in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) trials. No data on sex differences regarding subcutaneous ICDs (S-ICD) carriers have been described. Aim of our study was to investigate sex-related differences among unselected S-ICD recipients.

Methods And Results: Consecutive patients enrolled in the multicentre, international i-SUSI registry were analysed. Comparisons between sexes were performed using a 1:1 propensity matching adjusted analysis for age, body mass index (BMI), left ventricular function, and substrate. The primary outcome was the rate of appropriate shocks during follow-up. Inappropriate shocks and other device-related complications were deemed secondary outcomes. A total of 1698 patients were extracted from the i-SUSI registry; 399 (23.5%) were females. After propensity matching, two cohorts of 374 patients presenting similar baseline characteristics were analysed. Despite similar periprocedural characteristics and a matched BMI, women resulted at lower risk of conversion failure as per PRAETORIAN score (73.4% vs. 81.3%, P = 0.049). Over a median follow-up time of 26.5 [12.7-42.5] months, appropriate shocks were more common in the male cohort (rate/year 3.4% vs. 1.7%; log-rank P = 0.049), while no significant differences in device-related complications (rate/year: 6.3% vs. 5.8%; log-rank P = 0.595) and inappropriate shocks (rate/year: 4.3% vs. 3.1%; log-rank P = 0.375) were observed. After controlling for confounders, sex remained significantly associated with the primary outcome (aHR 1.648; CI 0.999-2.655, P = 0.048), while not resulting predictor of inappropriate shocks and device-related complications.

Conclusion: In a propensity-matched cohort of S-ICD recipients, women are less likely to experience appropriate ICD therapy, while not showing higher risk of device-related complications.

Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0473876.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11100525PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae115DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

inappropriate shocks
12
sex differences
8
differences subcutaneous
8
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
8
multicentre international
8
i-susi registry
8
propensity matching
8
primary outcome
8
appropriate shocks
8
shocks device-related
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!