AI Article Synopsis

  • - Secondary prevention with penicillin is crucial to avoiding repeat acute rheumatic fever and reducing the risk of rheumatic heart disease (RHD), though penicillin allergy reported by 10% of the population complicates this effort.
  • - A comprehensive review of literature revealed no studies specifically addressing penicillin allergy testing in our initial context, but findings from other populations indicated low confirmed allergy rates and very limited severe reactions (less than 1-3 per 1000 treated).
  • - Research on penicillin allergy delabeling showed that direct oral drug challenges resulted in fewer minor allergic reactions compared to skin testing, with no cases of anaphylaxis or fatalities; confirming or clearing penicillin allergies appears safe and has a low risk of adverse

Article Abstract

Secondary prevention with penicillin aims to prevent further episodes of acute rheumatic fever and subsequent development of rheumatic heart disease (RHD). Penicillin allergy, self-reported by 10% of the population, can affect secondary prevention programs. We aimed to assess the role for (i) routine penicillin allergy testing and the (ii) safety of penicillin allergy delabeling approaches in this context. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, ISRCTN, and CPCI-S to identify the relevant reports. We found 2419 records, but no studies addressed our initial question. Following advice from the WHO-Guideline committee and experts, we identified 6 manuscripts on allergy testing focusing on other populations showing that the prevalence of allergy confirmed by testing was low and the incidence of life-threatening reactions to BPG was very low (< 1-3/1000 individuals treated). A subsequent search addressed penicillin allergy delabeling. This found 516 records, and 5 studies addressing the safety of direct oral drug challenge vs. skin testing followed by drug administration in patients with suspected penicillin allergy. Immediate allergic reactions of minor severity were observed for a minority of patients and occurred less frequently in the direct drug challenge group: 2.3% vs. 11.5%; RR = 0.25, 95%CI 0.15-0.45, P < 0.00001, I = 0%. No anaphylaxis or deaths were observed. Severe allergic reactions to penicillin are extremely rare and can be recognized and dealt by trained healthcare workers. Confirmation of penicillin allergy diagnosis or delabeling using direct oral drug challenge or penicillin skin testing seems to be safe and is associated with a low rate of adverse reactions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11193836PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12016-024-08988-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

penicillin allergy
16
allergy testing
12
secondary prevention
8
penicillin
6
allergy
5
testing
4
testing delabeling
4
delabeling patients
4
patients prescribed
4
prescribed penicillin
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!