Integrated Assessment of Discrepancy Between Tracheal Tube and Tube Exchanger as Advancement: A Manikin Simulation Study.

Background: Advancing a tracheal tube over a tracheal tube exchanger into the trachea frequently causes difficulties because of the tube impingement on laryngeal structures. In the present study, we measured the resistance of tube advancement both objectively and subjectively with a variety of combinations of tube exchanger sizes and tracheal tubes using a manikin simulator.

Methods: Lubricated 7.5 mm ID standard and Parker Flex-Tip (PFT) tracheal tubes were railroaded over the tube exchangers (OD 1-6 mm) into the trachea through the oral route in a manikin. Consequently, 12 combinations of tracheal tube-exchanger tube assemblies were evaluated. Tube advancing resistance at the laryngeal inlet was subjectively evaluated. The objective tube advancing resistance (force) at the laryngeal inlet was evaluated using a digital force gauge. The execution of each tracheal tube-exchanger trial was conducted 10 times.

Results: With a 1-mm tube exchanger, all intubation attempts with both standard and PFT tubes failed. Esophageal intubation or severe impingement at the right arytenoid accompanied with a bent tracheal tube was observed. With a 2-mm tube exchanger, during intubation with a standard tracheal tube, rotation of the tube was sometimes required; however, all other intubations were done without problems. When PFT tubes were used, all intubation attempts were performed without problems. The rest of the trials were successfully performed regardless of the combinations of tube exchangers and tracheal tubes; however, one attempt of intubation with a combination of a 5 mm tube exchanger and a standard tracheal tube required withdrawal and rotation of the tube because of impingement at the epiglottis. In cases where there was no gap resistance, which means tube advancing resistance generated by a gap between an introducer and a tracheal tube, the pressing force was approximately less than 10 N. However, in the cases requiring some interventions to overcome the gap, the pressing force reached around 15 N. When intubation failed, for example when the tube bent, or esophageal intubation, the pressing force reached around 30 N.

Conclusions: Impingement due to the gap between the tube exchanger and the tracheal tube is thought to occur in the PFT tube less frequently. Once an impingement occurs, we can feel approximately twice the amount of resistance as usual, which may be a chance to consider taking some interventions. When the impingement is not released, regardless of interventions, excessive force may result in esophageal intubation or tracheal injury.