A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Analysis of predictors of clinical pregnancy and live birth in patients with RIF treated with IVF-ET technology: a cohort study based on a propensity score approach. | LitMetric

Objective: To investigate the predictors of clinical pregnancy and live birth rate in patients with recurrent embryo implantation failure (RIF) treated with fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) technique.

Method: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in Jinjiang District Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China. Patients were recruited who were enrolled at this hospital between November 1, 2019 and August 31, 2022, and who met the following criteria: a frozen embryo transfer (FET) at day 5 or 6 blastocyst stage was performed and the number of transfer cycles was not less than two. We collected information on age, height, weight, number of embryo transfer cycles, and information related to clinical outcomes. We used the group of patients who underwent ERA testing as the study group and those who underwent FET only as the control group, and matched baseline characteristics between the two groups by propensity score to make them comparable. We compared the differences in clinical outcomes between the two groups and further explored predictors of pregnancy and live birth using survival analysis and COX regression modeling.

Results: The success rate of clinical pregnancy in RIF patients was 50.74% and the live birth rate was 33.09%. Patients in the FET group were less likely to achieve clinical pregnancy compared to the ERA group ( = 0.788, 95% 0.593-0.978, < 0.05). Patients with >3 previous implantation failures had a lower probability of achieving a clinical pregnancy ( = 0.058, 95% 0.026-0.128, < 0.05) and a lower likelihood of a live birth ( = 0.055, 95% 0.019-0.160, < 0.05), compared to patients with ≤3 previous implantation failures. Patients who had two embryos transferred were more likely to achieve a clinical pregnancy ( = 1.357, 95% 1.079-1.889, < 0.05) and a higher likelihood of a live birth ( = 1.845, 95% 1.170-2.910, < 0.05) than patients who had a single embryo transfer. Patients with concomitant high-quality embryo transfer were more likely to achieve a clinical pregnancy compared to those without high-quality embryo transfer ( = 1.917, 95% 1.225-1.863, < 0.05).

Conclusion: Not receiving an ERA, having >3 previous implantation failures, using single embryo transfer and not transferring quality embryos are predictors for clinical pregnancy in patients with RIF. Having>3 previous implantation failures and using single embryo transfer were predictors for live birth in patients with RIF.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11059039PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1348733DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical pregnancy
20
live birth
16
pregnancy live
12
predictors clinical
8
rif treated
8
cohort study
8
propensity score
8
birth rate
8
embryo transfer
8
transfer cycles
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!