This study compared the acute effects of different ranges of motion (ROM) on fatigue and metabolic responses during repeated sets of bench press exercise. Ten resistance trained men performed three sets to momentary failure with two-min rest intervals at three different ROM: full ROM (FULL), and partial ROM in which the barbell was moved either at the bottom half (BOTTOM) or the top half (TOP) of the full barbell vertical displacement. In TOP, a higher load was lifted, and a higher total number of repetitions was performed compared to FULL and BOTTOM (130 ± 17.6 vs. 102.5 ± 15.9 vs. 98.8 ± 17.5 kg; 55.2 ± 9.8, 32.2 ± 6.5 vs. 49.1 ± 16.5 kg, respectively p < 0.01). Work per repetition was higher in FULL than TOP and BOTTOM (283 ± 43 vs. 205 ± 32 vs. 164 ± 31 J/repetition, p < 0.01). Mean barbell velocity at the start of set 1 was 21.7% and 12.8% higher in FULL compared to TOP and BOTTOM, respectively. The rate of decline in mean barbell velocity was doubled from set 1 to set 3 (p < 0.01) and was higher in FULL than both TOP and BOTTOM (p < 0.001). Also, the rate of mean barbell velocity decline was higher in BOTTOM compared to TOP (p = 0.045). Blood lactate concentration was similarly increased in all ROM (p < 0.001). Training at TOP ROM allowed not only to lift a higher load, but also to perform more repetitions with a lower rate of decline in mean barbell velocity. Despite the lower absolute load and work per repetition, fatigue was higher in BOTTOM than TOP and this may be attributed to differences in muscle length.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057609PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jhk/185524DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

barbell velocity
16
higher full
12
top bottom
12
top
9
fatigue metabolic
8
metabolic responses
8
responses repeated
8
repeated sets
8
sets bench
8
bench press
8

Similar Publications

Background: One repetition maximum (1RM) is a vital metric for exercise professionals, but various testing protocols exist, and their impacts on the resulting 1RM, barbell kinetics, and subsequent muscular performance testing are not well understood. This study aimed to compare two previously established protocols and a novel self-led method for determining bench press 1RM, 1RM barbell kinetics, and subsequent muscular performance measures.

Methods: Twenty-four resistance-trained males (n = 12, 24 ± 6.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Gundersen, AH, van den Tillaar, R, Falch, HN, Fredriksen, AB, and Larsen, S. A biomechanical comparison between conventional, sumo, and hex-bar deadlifts among resistance trained women. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-The deadlift is a multijoint exercise frequently used to strengthen the lower extremities and spinal erectors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study investigated how the load-velocity relationship variables change after different levels of fatigue induced by hexagonal barbell deadlift exercises in male resistance-trained individuals.
  • In three sessions, participants underwent either control (no training), moderate fatigue (5 sets at 70% 1RM), or high fatigue (5 sets to failure at 70% 1RM) protocols, with pre- and post-session load-velocity tests to measure changes.
  • Results showed that both 1 repetition maximum (1RM) and velocity variables were significantly reduced more in the high-fatigue condition, indicating that load-velocity relationship variables can effectively monitor fatigue levels during resistance training.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The aim of this study was to compare barbell velocities at different intensities and estimated 1-RM with actual 1-RM measured with different measuring tools in bench presses and squats. Fourteen resistance-trained athletes (eight men, six women, age 28.1 ± 7.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Preparation of athletes to begin a competition or enter mid-competition with the ability to reach peak performance immediately may be partly dependent on the efficacy of the warmup protocol. Previous research on flexible barbells reported significant differences in muscle activation when compared to steel barbells. The manufacturers of handheld flexible bars with a combined weight of 3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!